• YIj54yALOJxEsY20eU@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    11 months ago

    I have no idea how this wasn’t a lower hanging fruit. If theres one social service I want federated, its a git server.

    • poVoq@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      These are large existing code-bases that where developed without federation in mind. Gitlab also started working on AP federation, but like with Forgejo it looks like a multi-year project that it involves a lot of refactoring of the code.

      • YIj54yALOJxEsY20eU@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        I suppose I meant so far as priorities, I wasn’t clear. Hosting OSS seems like it would be one of the first things to federate imo.

    • Spedwell@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      What even is federation in the context of a distributed vcs like Git? Does it mean federation of the typical dev ops tools (issues, PRs, etc.)?

    • ViaFedi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      A central search engine would be a great start. Search across gitlab, github, codeberg etc.

    • Atemu@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Well, I mean, it’s been like that from the beginning. You don’t open a pull request to the Linux kernel through a web UI, you tell git to send Linus an email with your changes.