Justice Amanda Yip lifted the reporting restrictions on naming the killers of 16-year-old Brianna Ghey. They were identified at Manchester Crown Court as Scarlett Jenkinson and Eddie Ratcliffe.

The horrific murder shocked the nation. Ghey was stabbed with a hunting knife 28 times in her head, neck, chest and back in broad daylight after being lured to a park in the town of Warrington on Feb. 11, 2023.

Yip handed Ratcliffe and Jenkinson a mandatory life sentence, and ordered them to serve a minimum term of 20 and 22 years, respectively, before they could be eligible for parole. If they had been adults — over the age of 18 — they would have faced much longer minimum terms. They will be transferred to adult prisons when they turn 18. Neither showed no visible reaction on being sentenced.

  • UnfortunateDoorHinge
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    10 months ago

    They’re minors. In the UK and most of the developed world, you cannot give life without parole to a minor.

    • Daxtron2@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Idk I think people who murder a girl in cold blood shouldn’t ever be allowed to participate in society, but that’s just me.

      • WhatTrees@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        10 months ago

        They only get out on parole if the board (or whatever the UK’s equivalent is) believes they have learned a lesson and are safe to reenter society. If not then they stay until the next board meeting. I have a hard time imagining they would get out after 20 years for murder without the board being pretty damn sure they are no longer a danger to society.

        As gross and heinous as these crimes are, I will never favor life-without-parole or the death penalty for minors.

      • Lols [they/them]@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        if rehabilitation is possible, there is no real benefit to society to just keep folks in prison indefinitely, and in fact refusing to accept change for the better disincentivises folks from doing so

    • acceptable_pumpkin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      10 months ago

      And that’s unfortunate. This planet is already too crowded. Why spend resources on scum like this? Lock them away forever.

      • Jojo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        Worth noting that it costs a lot of state resources to lock them away forever.