• gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I say a 50% cut in immigration and giving agents more tools is an improvement to our old system.

    Does it bother you that white supremacists would agree?

    • HuddaBudda@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Unless we are going to go purge style on nazis?

      Right.

      Well if we aren’t up for that, we might as well work together to address common issues.

      Mainly that asylum seekers are traveling to get to America to find a broken system. We can blame on each other, and finger point, but this system broken because of a lack of compromise.

      And it isn’t like we can’t just twist the nobs of power to allow more immigrants later on once we have more stable footing, a wider majority, and a better designed immigration system.

    • norbert@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      What’s your point? It’s called compromise. Obviously we’re not going to completely lock the border down to 0 immigration, and obviously we’re not going to dissolve the border tomorrow. So you try to work out a deal making the most people happy while minimizing downsides.

      Does it bother you that white supremacists would agree? What’s your solution to the issue?