Privatizing the US national helium reserve. Gonna laugh when in a few years the government of another nation ends up owning it. Helium is dwindling finite resource that key technological infrastructure relies upon.

    • GalaxyBrain [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      5 months ago

      Despotism is not a useful political term at all and feudalism is a very specific form of a much broader economic system that was used in the middle ages. You have nonides what you’re talking about.

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        According to my knowledge it is just as useful a term as feudalism, describing a specific system.

        You have nonides what you’re talking about.

        Buddy, you are a communist , a flatearther from economics, an etherium proponent from economics, a homeopathic doctor from economics.

        And what you wrote is illiterate bullshit. Listen for once what people who are not from your sect say on things.

        • comrade_pibb [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          5 months ago

          Buddy, you are a communist , a flatearther from economics, an etherium proponent from economics, a homeopathic doctor from economics.

          hello it’s me a flatearther from economics

        • GalaxyBrain [they/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          5 months ago

          Despotism refers to a person in power making unilateral decisions, it is no means of describing any system of government.

          Define communism, I’ll let you once again look it up.

          • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Despotism refers to a person in power making unilateral decisions,

            Yeah, that too, so?

            it is no means of describing any system of government.

            Why is that?

            Define communism, I’ll let you once again look it up.

            Why would I? That wouldn’t change that I’m right. You seem to think that I have to prove something or dispute something with you to be right. I don’t.

            Also a hint - anybody can come up with any kind of definition. If I look it up, then what? Somebody you consider authoritative has approved a definition? Well, it’s one model you like, I may not, so why would I bother?

              • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                It’s working. I’ve literally met mollusks smarter than you

                Why would you write that if I just said I don’t care (EDIT: about an opinion of someone I wouldn’t take for any qualified job)?

                It’s because I’m trying to bait funny posts from you.

                You don’t have to bait anything, just ask

                  • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    Nothing in particular. I’d be confused to meet and like one perceived as a woman, though. Not in a bigoted way, but in a same way as meeting black people having grown in a country where that’s rare.

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Despotism is an absolute monarchy where technically there’s only one free man, the monarch, and all the subjects, including nobles or whatever, are his property. There’s no contracts or something to this. The monarch’s power is delegated as they wish to the state apparatus of whatever kind they choose. That’d be Russia since Peter or, say, Safavid Persia, and frankly a few German states in the new age despite sporting feudal symbolic.

        Feudalism is a system of vassal-suzerain and allied relationships, contractual and not even that centralized, as a feudal entity can even be vassal to multiple other entities (games like CK get this wrong, which makes, say, Denmark there less fun than it was) and have its own various contractual ties. With feudalism every person’s status is complex, there are individual privileges and obligations to every entity.

        Feudalism is much more sophisticated than a despotic monarchy. IMHO it’s the main reason Europeans dominate this planet.

        EDIT: By the way, Decembrists paid a lot of attention to that difference, if we get back to Russian history.

        • Dolores [love/loves]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          5 months ago

          feudal contracts literally don’t exist michael-laugh they’re a made up justification of the feudal system that was exposed as false in 1789 when the french peasants found no such things in the manors of their lords

          IMHO it’s the main reason Europeans dominate this planet

          feudalism is not at all a unique phenomenon to europe. you say you get this from Crusader Kings, babe look at the rest of the crusader kings map. africans and middle eastern people did that too

          • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            you say you get this from Crusader Kings

            I said its model is wrong.

            africans and middle eastern people did that too

            Nope. Not that particular thing.

            • Dolores [love/loves]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              14
              ·
              5 months ago

              i’m sure it’s just a wild coincidence that syrians & latins in the crusades didn’t think their forms of government were different, but i realize i’m talking to someone that’s not read a single primary source for what they are oh-so-knowledgable about

          • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Peasants are not a party to those contracts. You’ve just invented a definition and said that what I meant doesn’t fit under it.

            Well, it’s your definition, you can fuck around with it however you like, just don’t get too excited over something existing only in your head.

            • Dolores [love/loves]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              5 months ago

              ah yeah its a contractual superior system to “despotism” that’s distinct because it has contracts. “who do those contracts apply to?” “less than 1% of the population”

              and if you’re so sure they’re this defining characteristic of a whole economic system and epoch, present them to me