Following his trial for defamation of the families of the children and school staff killed in the Sandy Hook massacre, conspiracy theorist Alex Jones is using Valve Corp.ā€™s Steam, the worldā€™s largest digital distribution platform for PC games, to sell an Infowars-themed video game. Jones claims to have earned hundreds of thousands in revenue from the video game, yet he has refused to pay the Sandy Hook families. Alex Jones: NWO Wars also mirrors and cartoonishly repackages the conspiracy theoristā€™s regularly violent, hateful rhetoric despite the platformā€™s policies against hate speech.

  • Ook the Librarian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    Ā·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    While I donā€™t find it particularly endearing that you are trying to dunk on a guy that is admittedly not engaged in the topic, Iā€™ll bite

    the body of the thread a posted on c/knowledgefight,

    Iā€™ll take a listen to the podcast, but I think you are right in that itā€™s only tangentially relevant. Although itā€™s existence shows the topic wonā€™t die easily.

    Personally, I think we should move the conversation there since posting here feels like youā€™re trying to get more eyeballs on this stuff. I find this stuff dangerous, and itā€™s usually best discussed in a more focused group.

    I donā€™t recall calling the episode tangentially relevant. It contains the best evidence Iā€™ve heard for Pizzagate.

    Iā€™ll be honest, I have no idea what that last sentence (ā€œAlthoughā€¦ā€) is supposed to mean. These things wonā€™t die easily because there is nothing that will ever stop people like Alex Jones screaming that Democrats drink baby blood. People believe him, and are loud about it. The fact that an idea shows no signs of dying out is not going to get me to believe it. (Iā€™m a Taurus, after all.)

    No victims coming forward.

    Such a bad argument. Are you expecting an abused kid to file a police report? Look at Epsteinā€™s Virginia Giuffre who is now 40! At least the guardianā€™s of the kids in the Instagram photos should have been questioned.

    Bad argument? At least engage with it. You ask me to look to Epsteinā€™s Virginia Giuffre. Who as you know, was a victim who came forward. This is the kind of evidence Iā€™m asking for.

    Please, and I mean it, please I want to see it, show me any pundit that ā€œbunksā€ pizzagate talking-points that also said anything about Epstein before Giuffreā€™s public assertions.

    There are no victims in pizzagate. What are you doing bringing Epstein into this? He was brought down by victims coming forward. The lack of evidence is no reason to point fingers.

    No suspicious activity.

    There was enough to send 4chan and reddit into a frenzy. I think you mean that there was no definitive proof.

    Oh lordy. Was I dismissive of things that sent 4chan and reddit into a frenzy? Iā€™m sorry. That must sting a bit. That is your best evidence so far.

    The only thing interesting about pizzagate is how strongly people can hold on to beliefs with zero backing.

    I thought the most interesting thing was how hard the pushback was. Pizza owners on the news, 10 min features on Colbert, NYT and Rolling Stone articles, banning of subreddits and censoring of search results. Try to find the steemit article I linked above. There was a well organised PR campaign against ā€œnothingā€.

    Weā€™re both just stating our opinions here. But I thought the pushback was perfectly inline. How else do you reach the kind of people who believe things based whatever they hear from pundits claiming to have secret knowledge?

    I suspect some of the conclusions being drawn from highly circumstantial evidence were too close to the truth for some influential peopleā€™s comfort.

    Thatā€™s very vague and spooky. Does it have a meaning?

    Iā€™m sure 99% of posts about pizzagate are LARPing really.

    Initially all politicians were suspected (e.g. Hastert is republican). It turned into a right wing topic after qanon stoked the fires.

    Wow. Bold of you to bring up another known pedophile. His downfall was the FBI seeing suspicious cash withdrawls. So who was that money going to? Thatā€™s right, a verified victim of molestation by Denny Hastert. You known, one of the (sorry to call them) characters Iā€™d like to see in this pizzagate accusation. You only get to call Hastert a pedophile because a victim came forward.

    And qanon stoking fires is another conspiracy point I will simply not engage with. Qanon is too unfounded for me.

    In fact, Iā€™d go as far as to say, the fact there is no evidence backing it up is precisely why this stuff is so dangerous.

    True. On the other hand, vigilantism occurs when the police say theyā€™ve investigated but actually havenā€™t. (Sorry impossible to back this statement in 2024. If you doubt me, find some official DC police reports unrelated to the gunman attack)

    I live in America. That investigation went as far as it could before violating the rights of a private business owner. Your parry here truly shows how dangerous this is.

    However, out in the dangerous part of the world, no one cares about this. Itā€™s so fucking easy to dismiss this stuff. Why would anyone believe it?

    It happened in Belgium, UK, France, Portugal etc. People there cared. Why not also in the US?

    Iā€™m sorry. I was being metaphorical here. When I said ā€œout in the dangerous part of the worldā€, I was speaking for the POV of the fictional infowarrior. By the dangerous part of the world, I simply meant reality. Where people do not engage with these fear-mongers who actually proclaim that Democrats drink the blood of babies. Reality is where these baseless ideas and beliefs make one feel isolated. This is last I will engage here as I feel Iā€™m being quoted out of context.

    This feels like persecution, gaslighting, and like ā€œtheyā€ are all in on it.

    Podesta and Alefantis have certainly been persecuted by the Internet. And probably still are being 8 years later. Their no comment policy certainly backfired.

    I have no idea what this is supposed to mean. It sounds like you are bragging about making peoples lives miserable based on nothing.

    • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      Ā·
      5 months ago

      Personally, I think we should move the conversation there since posting here feels like youā€™re trying to get more eyeballs on this stuff.

      Iā€™m indifferent. Not trying to grab eyeballs, just trying to find different angles on the topic. Anyone who claims it was debunked is interesting because they may have more knowledge than I (i.e. you and you podcasts). Post a thread and Iā€™ll follow.

      I find this stuff dangerous, and itā€™s usually best discussed in a more focused group.

      We are discussing 8 year old emails and Instagram posts. Not planning an insurrection.

      It contains the best evidence Iā€™ve heard for Pizzagate.

      The link I clicked quickly through was making fun of some Alex Jones contributors ordering pizza.

      The fact that an idea shows no signs of dying out is not going to get me to believe it.

      Agreed. My point was that continued claims of debunking donā€™t reduce interest in the subject.

      Virginia Giuffre was a victim who came forward.

      Only as a middle aged woman. Kids in the Instagram photos would now barely be over 10. You canā€™t use their silence as evidence.

      What are you doing bringing Epstein into this?

      Iā€™m showing that sex trafficked people donā€™t often come forward. In Epsteinā€™s case it took 20+ years.

      any pundit that ā€œbunksā€ pizzagate talking-points that also said anything about Epstein

      Sorry. Not a claim or a point Iā€™m defending.

      There are no victims in pizzagate.

      We have photos of some from Instagram.

      That is your best evidence so far.

      No, the. Best evidence is the steemit summary above. That made a LOT of people suspicious.

      How else do you reach the kind of people who believe things based whatever they hear from pundits claiming to have secret knowledge?

      The conspiracy crowd were not the target audience. You certainly donā€™t go through Colbert. It was pure Streisand effect.

      Thatā€™s very vague and spooky. Does it have a meaning?

      It was my attempt at explaining the massive national media campaign supporting a pizza shop owner against apparently ridiculous allegations. Protesting too much.

      Wow. Bold of you to bring up another known pedophile.

      Because he was republican and mentioned in friendly terms by Podesta. Iā€™m dismissing the ā€œright wingā€ tag that gets attached to pizzagate. Often via Qanon.

      And qanon stoking fires is another conspiracy point I will simply not engage with. Qanon is too unfounded for me.

      I think that is fair. Qanon came later. It should be separate but people often confuse the two.

      That investigation went as far as it could before violating the rights of a private business owner

      No. There was no investigation (sorry, no supporting evidence). ā€œPrivate business ownerā€ has nothing to do with suggestive Instagram posts involving children.

      Where people do not engage with these fear-mongers who actually proclaim that Democrats drink the blood of babies.

      Ah. So you arenā€™t saying this couldnā€™t happen. Just that youā€™d ignore anyone who pointed out if it was happening.

      Why introduce "drink the blood of babies. "? Irrelevant hyperbole adds nothing.

      I feel Iā€™m being quoted out of context.

      Sorry, not my goal. Just trying to make reading easier. Misquoting is pointless here.

      It sounds like you are bragging about making peoples lives miserable based on nothing.

      Iā€™ve had no interaction with either.

      You mentioned persecution and they have both been on the receiving end. However, if they had been investigated by law enforcement, or publicly addressed their accusations then there would be no persecution (or at least much less).


      I assume you are in the debunked camp. Can I ask what makes you so sure there was nothing suspicious happening?

      • Ook the Librarian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        Ā·
        5 months ago

        You said youā€™d listen to the podcast. Iā€™m going to hold you to it. Itā€™s a comedy show. And pizzagate is ridiculous. But you offered to argue their points. ā€œtheyā€™re mean to my friendsā€ isnā€™t going to cut it.

        The best evidence for your claim is that link? Please read the FIRST paragraph and letā€™s discuss the reading level of The Emperorā€™s New Clothes.

        Iā€™ve read it pretty deeply now. You better start connecting some dots. There is too much secret sourcing.

        Iā€™m not even sure what ā€œclaims of debunkingā€ you even mean. What even are the claims of pizzagate? That the emails are boring, but if you squint, you can pretend itā€™s a conspiracy. Itā€™s the least interesting thing Iā€™ve heard. Whatā€™s to engage with? There are no bodies. No victims. The crimes alleged must have victims. What court is going to convict anybody on these charges with no victims? Have the jury squint at instagram pics? Please give your argument some grounding.

        I am not afraid of a lack of victims. The existence of victims would blow this wide open.

        Please tell me of a historical case (aka in reality) where a pedo ring was busted with no known victims.

        • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          Ā·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          pizzagate is ridiculous.

          Depends which particular claim you are talking about.

          • Hillary locking up kids in a basement ā€¦ ridiculous. This strawman was invented to be debunked.

          • A pizza restaurant owner with an unhealthy interest in kids ā€¦ not ridiculous.

          Iā€™m not even sure what ā€œclaims of debunkingā€ you even mean.

          It means the claimer is 100% sure that a particular theory is false.

          Flat Earth - debunked

          Political figures discuss illegal topics over email using codewords - could be true

          What even are the claims of pizzagate?

          • Pizza owner distributes CP from his restaurant website.

          • The Podestas talk in code over email.

          • Instagram was used to joke about child abuse.

          Whatā€™s to engage with? There are no bodies. No victims. The crimes alleged must have victims.

          You are 100% sure there are no victims?

          Child services have interviewed the guardianā€™s of the girl taped to a table?

          It is impossible that these people were discussing abusing kids?

          To debunk a theory, that is what is needed.

          What court is going to convict anybody on these charges with no victims? Have the jury squint at instagram pics? Please give your argument some grounding.

          OK, this is never claimed. Investigations by law enforcement to find the required level of evidence to present to a court were never conducted. Why not?

          Please tell me of a historical case (aka in reality) where a pedo ring was busted with no known victims.

          Any where images are traded. Victims are unknown but unfortunately exist.

          • Ook the Librarian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            Ā·
            5 months ago

            They interviewed a child that was taped to a table, huh?

            You have made NO claims whatsoever. You asked what I thought. I said it was nothing. All youā€™ve said is everything that I say is wrong. I have no idea what you think pizzagate is.

            So now that you FINALLY made a claim. Letā€™s talk about the girl taped to a table. Does this girl have a name? A picture. Please post the instagram of this poor child taped to a table. I bet the picture will send chills though all the spines of those that see it. POST THE PICTURE! Or I will. You certainly have provided me evidence of a child taped to a table. Can do you have a picture where she isnā€™t smiling?

            Was she interviewed by the FBI? Is that your big, scary evidence? The thing that should open my eyes. Please provide evidence of this child that was taped to table. Thatā€™s a pretty BIG claim. Do you have a picture? I mean, I have one that you showed me. It had a warning above it how disturbing the picture is. Would you post so everyone can see how scary it is?

            All youā€™ve said about pizzagate, is that I donā€™t know what pizzagate is. Is it that a child was taped to a table?

            • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              Ā·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              They interviewed a child that was taped to a table, huh?

              No. Not that Iā€™m aware of. Do you have more information?

              You asked what I thought. I said it was nothing.

              Are you certain it is nothing or is it probably nothing. If the former then I would like to know why.

              Letā€™s talk about the girl taped to a table. Does this girl have a name?

              Yes. The question of interest is, do child services know her name?

              Please post the instagram of this poor child taped to a table.

              Itā€™s in the steemit summary linked above.

              Can do you have a picture where she isnā€™t smiling?

              So itā€™s not abuse if they enjoy it? Heard of normalisation?

              All youā€™ve said about pizzagate, is that I donā€™t know what pizzagate is.

              I donā€™t think Iā€™ve said anything of the sort. You seem quite knowledgeable. However, if you are certain it has been debunked then you must be an expert.

              • Ook the Librarian@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                Ā·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                Since knock_knock is too demure to show graphic content here, I will share the photo. These are the words above the photo in the document

                Warning: some of these are pretty weird/sexual, probably best not to view at work

                We might as well start with this picture of a girl taped to a table, which is probably the most widely referenced one.

                spoiler

                THIS is the ā€œmost widely referencedā€ picture of all the pizzagate allegations. THIS is why itā€™s like pulling teeth to get a pizzagater to make ONE real claim. The emperor has no clothes. They are so proud of a mountain of nothing.

                There is no one who is credibility alleged to have explicit material of this child. It is at this point where I am expected to appear to ask for this material. This could be a crime. Be careful. Look how fast this reply was locked-and-loaded.

                Can do you have a picture where she isnā€™t smiling?

                So itā€™s not abuse if they enjoy it? Heard of normalisation?

                If you think that question is void now due to that retort, you are mistaken. Anyone reading along can see the photo now. You really should have tried to get ahead of that. I bet no one was picturing masking tape with the picture you created in words.

                I have showed the only evidence provided that this child exists. Are there alleged to be other materials of this child that are objectionable? Is this a victim?

                Virginia Giuffre was a victim who came forward.

                Only as a middle aged woman. Kids in the Instagram photos would now barely be over 10. You canā€™t use their silence as evidence.

                ā€œYou canā€™t use their silence as evidence.ā€ What? They sound exactly like nonexistent victims. There must be a difference between real victims and nonexistent victims. Silence is clearly not a good measurement. Are there any other methods to look for them?

                any pundit that ā€œbunksā€ pizzagate talking-points that also said anything about Epstein

                Sorry. Not a claim or a point Iā€™m defending.

                I know this isnā€™t a claim. Itā€™s a point worth discussing. There are people in our society whose job is gain the trust of people by showing integrity. They are called journalists. A journalist knows that if a reader catches the whiff of dishonesty, they lose that reader permanently.

                So a journalist with a long, track-able career is who is best equipped to make such sensitive accusations. This is usually how rings would get busted. So who is putting their career on the line for this? Is Mike Cernovich the point-person on these matters? These accusations are dangerous. Your dismal of that is sickening, but Iā€™ll come back to that later.

                Iā€™m not even sure what ā€œclaims of debunkingā€ you even mean.

                It means the claimer is 100% sure that a particular theory is false

                This is the worst framing of epistemology Iā€™ve seen. You are quite literally turning every argument in a ā€œconfidence gameā€. Surely you see that the world canā€™t function like that.

                But I will give you this, you finally connected the dots in a way that I see how pizzagate is real.

                Weā€™ve had too many exchanges before I finally can see what pizzagate actually is.

                Pizzagate: The believe that real world damage can be caused simply by never admitting any harmless explanations regardless of plausibility.

                The fucked up thing here, is that with this formulation, Pizzagate is true.

                1.) The only thing that little girlā€™s guardians did was upload a photo of the aftermath of childā€™s play.

                2.) Now, 4chan enters the scene. 4chan and reddit simply make up ANYTHING they want to accuse these people of. Consequence free. There is no journalist in the loop. There are no stakes. You get federal authorities to harass strangers. And you are proud of it.

                3.) THEN this visit is now ā€œevidenceā€. You keep pointing to police action, like itā€™s suspicious, but 4chan did that shit. I donā€™t know who you are fooling, but it isnā€™t me.

                These three dots are what you connected. You have convinced me itā€™s real. Itā€™s scary. Itā€™s sick that people would do this.

                You can claim itā€™s about protecting kids, but there have been no rescues or even calls for help.

                Hereā€™s from Wikipedia

                On December 4, 2016, Edgar Maddison Welch, a 28-year-old man from Salisbury, North Carolina, arrived at Comet Ping Pong and fired three shots from an AR-15 style rifle that struck the restaurantā€™s walls, a desk, and a door.

                Welch was there to liberate victims. Who did he avenge? Who is lucky that Welch was there to listen to the cries of help that 4chan told him exist?

                I find this stuff dangerous, and itā€™s usually best discussed in a more focused group.

                We are discussing 8 year old emails and Instagram posts. Not planning an insurrection.

                Three bullets are what Iā€™m calling dangerous, sicko. You know what is happening. You know the bullets were real.

                You seem very proud that the feds were sent to investigate this. That seems to be a claim of victory. Itā€™s disturbing. There was no foundation. You just hate these people. Itā€™s unpleasant to say the least. Youā€™re proud you can imagine such horrible things happening. You donā€™t even need proof. And you just want the world to hate these people like you do, and based on as flimsy shit as you accept as proof.

                Iā€™m done here. Pizzagate sucks. You can come bother me at /c/knowledgefight.

                • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  Ā·
                  5 months ago

                  THIS is why itā€™s like pulling teeth to get a pizzagater to make ONE real claim.

                  I gave you 3 claims, and you picked your own 4th.

                  It is at this point where I am expected to appear to ask for this material. This could be a crime. Be careful. Look how fast this reply was locked-and-loaded.

                  Ah, now I see why you were so weirdly desperate for me to post that particular photo. You had a narrative needing to be fulfilled. Sorry to disappoint.

                  Are there alleged to be other materials of this child that are objectionable?

                  Yes, and they havenā€™t been acted upon either.

                  Is this a victim?

                  Potentially, yes. How are you imagining this kid ā€œcoming forwardā€ to the authorities?

                  Silence is clearly not a good measurement. Are there any other methods to look for them?

                  Yep. By photos posted online by their abusers. By having child services interview their guardians.

                  Theses accusations are dangerous.

                  And should have been handled by the police. They werenā€™t.

                  There is no one who is credibility alleged to have explicit material of this child.

                  No-one claimed this either. Debunkers love to invent strawmen to attack.

                  1.) The only thing that little girlā€™s guardians did was upload a photo of the aftermath of childā€™s play.

                  Your favourite picture is far from the only suspicious Instagram post/comment

                  You get federal authorities to harass strangers.

                  Literally their job. And they point is they werenā€™t doing it.

                  sicko.

                  You are the one defending the guy with a ā€œmembers onlyā€ file share on his website who makes child abuse jokes on Instagram.

                  based on as flimsy shit as you accept as proof.

                  This applies equally to debunkers who think ā€œno basementā€ is proof that pizzagate is false.

                  Iā€™m not convinced any part of pizzagate is real, but you (and other debunkers) are convinced it is 100% fake. Thatā€™s what is interesting.

                  Pizzagate debunkers are just as fervently irrational as the unquestioning gun toting believers.

                  • Ook the Librarian@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    Ā·
                    edit-2
                    5 months ago

                    THIS is why itā€™s like pulling teeth to get a pizzagater to make ONE real claim.

                    I gave you 3 claims, and you picked your own 4th.

                    Would you like me to read one of those 3 claims?

                    Instagram was used to joke about child abuse.

                    So letā€™s see weā€™re YOU are finding this instagram stuff. Hmmā€¦

                    No, the. Best evidence is the steemit summary above. That made a LOT of people suspicious

                    Ok, we know where your BEST evidence is. Letā€™s figure out this instagram claim.

                    Here are the times YOU brought up Instagram:

                    At least the guardianā€™s of the kids in the Instagram photos should have been questioned.


                    We are discussing 8 year old emails and Instagram posts.


                    Virginia Giuffre was a victim who came forward.

                    Only as a middle aged woman. Kids in the Instagram photos would now barely be over 10.


                    There are no victims in pizzagate.

                    We have photos of some from Instagram.


                    That investigation went as far as it could before violating the rights of a private business owner

                    No. There was no investigation (sorry, no supporting evidence). ā€œPrivate business ownerā€ has nothing to do with suggestive Instagram posts involving children.


                    You talk a lot about instagram for someone who finds the FIRST instagram picture from your GOLDEN source embarrassing. Here, Iā€™ll add context. Iā€™ll expand the crop. And let see what this fear-mongering document saysā€¦

                    Itā€™s the ā€œmost widely referenced oneā€. YOU are the one pointing to internet ā€œfrenziesā€ as evidence. An internet frenzy was whipped up about this ONE picture in particular. There are no other pictures related to this child. YOU are claiming the other photos are connected.

                    Adding more context makes the evidence look WORSE.

                    Also notice that the simple explanation isnā€™t good enough: ā€œplease let me know if there are moreā€. They want another explanation because then ā€œsee, theyā€™re changing their storyā€. For some reason they want the reader to be suspicious of only ONE explanation. Reality works in a strange way for people who think like this.

                    Then every pizzagater ever says, ā€œthatā€™s why you picked THAT photo. Of course the one my opponent chooses one that makes me look silly. They wonā€™t show you the other stuff I sent them. Please read the first paragraph at least, where it says if you donā€™t see EVERYTHING, youā€™ll be too ignorant to know the truth.ā€

                    They are always saying ā€œlook at everything. but donā€™t look at anything.ā€

                    The only claim I made is that I have seen no proof of illegal activity. There are plenty of times in my life where I have seen proof of illegal activity. Itā€™s a pretty common thing to see on the news. I donā€™t see why I should worry about people who have weird tastes in art. I see a lot of mixing pizza, weird art, and sex in that doc, but not kids. Iā€™m worried about one who see that photo as normalization of child abuse. (Here is where that claim of ā€œIā€™m not claiming THAT photo is what iā€™m talking about. donā€™t you see how vague iā€™m being. look at everythingā€ This is 30-Rockā€™s ā€œHomonym Gameā€ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WZLkcFns8Ks )

                    Seeing a girl smiling with masking tape on her arms does NOT look like normalization [i use US spelling]

                    Can do you have a picture where she isnā€™t smiling?

                    So itā€™s not abuse if they enjoy it? Heard of normalisation?

                    You are either being very disingenuous here, or you find that image stirring. I do not want to accuse you of anything, but the reason I want a journalist in the loop is because every pizzagater with any sizable voice is WITHOUT FAIL either (a) trying to convince people (including themselves) that SA material of minors is more common than it is or (b) very homophobic.

                    The document you provided is teeming with homophobia.

                    I am implementing a new rule. I will not engage with pizzagate arguments with people unless they pledge: ā€œThere is a gay person in my life that I love, and they live a meaningful, fulfilling life.ā€ Thatā€™s probably not hard. Honestly, I donā€™t care if you know them personally.

                    If you canā€™t do that, Iā€™d rather deal with a more serious mind virus.