• NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    108
    ·
    11 months ago

    Hmm, but I did not agree to those privacy policies nor was I provided with a copy.

    This seems like potential grounds for a lawsuit. Anyone have an idea how to demonstrate harm?

    • 9point6@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      58
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’m pretty sure the EU GDPR requires explicit & clear consent for data collection.

      That’s up to a £17.5m fine or 4% of your annual turnover, whichever is higher

      • Deceptichum@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        That’s nothing.

        100% of last years profit. Make them almost die the first time and utterly ruin them if they do it a second.

        Sick of these insignificant fines that do nothing to stop these companies.

        • Womble@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          28
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          4% of turnover is massive. Take BMW as an example, 4% of their revenue is 5.7Billion dollars, compared to their net profit of 18.6Billion. One third of their entire profit is absolutely enough to make them do everything they can to avoid it. Also, importantly, they cant get up to creative accounting to minimise revenue, misrepresenting that is fraud, unlike profit when companies get up to all sorts of tricks to artificiality lower it.

          • 9point6@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            11 months ago

            Honestly BMW comes out quite well in the scenario compared to many of their competitors. I looked up Citroen, Fiat, Ford & GM and they all were in the range of 60-90% of their profit getting wiped out by a GDPR 4% fine.

            I was kinda hoping to find one over 100% profit, but I decided not to spend the rest of my evening looking up annual financials for car manufactures

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          I see no reason to cap fines to anything less than 100% of gross revenue. An egregious enough violation should kill the company (which has no inherent right to exist, BTW – being granted a corporate charter is a privilege), even if it’s the first one.

        • Sanctus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          Its not even borderline ridiculous. The fines are so low they just incorporate them into operating costs. Jail the entire executive suit and board if a company does this shit, no bail.

          • 9point6@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            I highlighted turnover deliberately. 4% of any company’s turnover is absolutely not something that can be rolled into BAU running costs.

            Not least of all, if a company doesn’t fix the violations, they’ll come for it again with a fresh 4% fine.

            Edit: typo

    • CobblerScholar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      11 months ago

      How about national security? Russia or NK might struggle hacking the CIA but Nissan or Mercedes ain’t going to have the same security. Now you have hundreds of thousands of multifaceted information collection devices spread throughout the whole country in the hands of companies that would take the seat belts out if they weren’t legally required to put them in.

      • Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        This is exactly why it’s forbidden to discuss classified information outside of a secure facility… even if you think you’re alone with another cleared person.

        Obviously, humans are gonna do human things, but the government has policies in place to try and prevent this sort of leak from occurring.

        • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          11 months ago

          This isn’t just about government secrets. This data could be used to blackmail someone based on where their car was and at what time or use other data acquired from the car against them.

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    11 months ago

    Researchers found data is being gathered by sensors, microphones, cameras, and the phones and devices drivers connect to their cars, as well as by car apps, company websites, dealerships, and vehicle telematics. Brands can then share or sell this data to third parties. Car brands can also take much of this data and use it to develop inferences about a driver’s intelligence, abilities, characteristics, preferences, and more.

    What the actual crispy-fried fuck is this? Drivers intelligence? Sexual activity?!?

    • Snapz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      “I can tell you’re a very smart man, sir… I’ve got a hunch that you’ll buy this car if I jerk you off during a test drive, what do you say… do we have a deal?”

    • baseless_discourse@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I am sure they cannot legally sale data about bystanders who have not agreed to their policy, right? right?

    • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      They need to know what subscription porn service would best accompany your infotainment system on your way to work.

  • Rascabin@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    11 months ago

    Can’t they just make dumb EVs for now? I mean we don’t have to go all out Starks Enterprises with every EV to attract customers. I still need buttons and things i can feel while driving.

    • Steve@communick.news
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Not related to EVs at all. Every new, feature rich car, is like this.
      Camera systems for semi-autonomous driving, blind spot warnings, and parking assist. Always on cellular connections for maps, navigation, and roadside assistance. The tech has been in most cars for a decade or more. It’s the last 5ish years the manufactures realized they could collect all the data and have another revenue stream.

    • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      11 months ago

      Not to mention how much cheaper an EV could be if it had manual windows, less software, less microphones, less screens and just overall focused on being a car before being a smart device, status symbol, or entertainment system.

    • powerofm@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 months ago

      The problem is tech is cheap, especially software. Even moreso when the data you gain is so valuable.

      • Lysol@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        11 months ago

        It’s like you’ll have to go convert like a 2005 ICE car to electric to get a “nice car without tech shit I never asked for”.

        • the_third@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          Eh, the pre-facelift Hyundai Ioniq electric is the last usable EV without a data connection, I’d say. Was built until 2020.

        • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          Whoever makes a “remove the bullshit you don’t want” service for new cars is going to make a lot of money.

  • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    11 months ago

    I sure hope the Mercedes marketing team that analyses the use of their voice assist enjoys my teenage son’s enthousiastic “Hey Mercedes, suck my dick!” and endless variations.

  • Aniki 🌱🌿@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Does anyone know of a resource for figuring out where the SIM cards are in all these modern cars? You really can have all the privacy you want if you remove the ability of these spywheels to call home.

    • Rascabin@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 months ago

      Probably the equivalent of where the Death Star’s weakness lies. Hard to reach on purpose.

      • Aniki 🌱🌿@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        11 months ago

        For sure – but I’m not asking if average joe-asshole can figure out which end of the screwdriver works best. I’m asking if there’s resources for where in the car the black boxes live. Service manuals - ect.

        • DaGeek247@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          11 months ago

          There is. On my toyota it was called the DCM telematics module. Had its own fuse so it was super easy to disable.

          • Aniki 🌱🌿@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            interesting! was there any persistent warnings or error messages that popped up or did it just keep on trucking without any user prompting?

            • DaGeek247@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              11 months ago

              The car mic and one of the right side speakers stopped working. The ota updates also stopped arriving, and toyota stopped sending me emails about where my car had been / how long it was driven. The emergency button which calls the toyota help line is also broken now.

              There were no warnings from my car at all after i pulled the fuse.

              There’s some forum posts about rewiring the speaker back into the system - apparently you only need an extra plug, a little bit of wiring skills, and access through the glove box to get it working again. I havent personally done it yet, but ill get around to it at some point.

    • 50MYT
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Sorry to say but I bet they are eSim

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    11 months ago

    So, what does Toyota say they can do with this treasure trove of information? Well, some of it they seem to treat responsibly. Like the facial geometric features they get when they scan your face to identify your for your driver profile they say will only be processed and stored on your car.

    . . . Exsqueeze me? Scan my face? Um. That’s a big negatory.

  • hark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    11 months ago

    With phones, doorbells, TVs, cars, and more all recording constantly, will there be any space left that offers actual privacy?