• DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    People recently invented a fancy thing called compromise. It means you can choose your second best preference if your first is not available.

    E.g. I would preffer steak for lunch but I will take pizza over being hungry.

      • 1ostA5tro6yne@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        do you compromise your morals and throw the switch, killing only one person, or stick to your moral convictions and allow it to kill five by your inaction?

        • Girru00@lemmy.world
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Ah yes, life imprisonment, the greatest way to empower a murderer to kill… i guess other people in prison… who should be killed… so they wont kill each other… or…?

          • 1ostA5tro6yne@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            well actually i meant was choosing harm reduction is better than tossing your hands up and doing nothing when your ideal isn’t an option but if you want to pretend that’s what i meant that’s fine. par for the course on this instance.