Pretty appalling if the false positive rates are as high as the article makes them out to be. It certainly seems as though no human is actually reviewing the evidence as claimed, or if they are, it’s only to catch out complete furbies like a photo that doesn’t even contain a car.

I’m supportive of the technology in principle, but it has to actually work. In its current state, I can’t see any real answer but to immediately cease its usage until something that actually works can be implemented.