Toyota-owned automaker halts Japan production after admitting it tampered with safety tests for 30 years | CNN Business::Daihatsu, the Japanese automaker owned by Toyota, has halted production after admitting it falsified data in safety tests for its vehicles for 30 years.

  • RickRussell_CA@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    154
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Odd that they put “Toyota-owned automaker” in the headline instead of Daihatsu. Or something like, :“Daihatsu, owned by Toyota”.

    Whether the problems go “up the chain” to the parent company is TBD, I guess.

    • cowpowered@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      There’s a pretty good reasoning for this in the article:

      “an independent third-party committee had found evidence of tampering with safety tests on as many as 64 vehicle models, including those sold under the Toyota brand.

      • RickRussell_CA@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        And, presumably other brands that come from Daihatsu plants. Assuming the safety issues are only within Daihatsu facilities, that’s the key information. “Daihatsu, a Toyota subsidiary” or similar conveys the useful information. “Toyota-owned automaker” does not.

        As it stands, it sounds like CNN is trying to vaugely imply that the problem applies to Toyota generally, which obvs will get a lot of clicks from people who own Toyotas. That’s sloppy clickbait.

    • Salvo
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Daihatsu already has the reputation of cheap and nasty vehicles. If they mentioned Daihatsu in the Title, it wouldn’t be news. By burying the lede and referring to them as “Toyota Owned”, it is now news.

      Daihatsu only because a wholly owned subsidiary in 2017. I don’t blame Toyota for this at all. I assume that the falsified tests were only recently discovered by Upper management and corporate management, which is why it took 6 years before it was publicly reported.