• CalamityBalls@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      As someone who works making glass, I want to underline that it’s silica dust that is dangerous. Your windows, drinking glasses, pyrex jugs, dinner plates, they’ll all be around 40–50% silica and are absolutely safe. Silicosis is a reaction to the shape of silica particles when inhaled, the particles cause scarring in the lungs and aren’t “mucused out”, so they remain causing more damage over time.

      I can’t think of any reason to ban anything for containing silica, the problem is mitigated by wearing a mask in areas where there are airborne particles.

        • CalamityBalls@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ah, I missed what you were getting at before. Agreed, can’t see why engineered stone should be a particular hazard if proper safety measures are being taken. Best guess is that they weren’t, and this ban is simply the chosen way to stop people being harmed by the work. Just seems more performative than useful.

    • zero_gravitas
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      This comment gives a great summary, better than I can do: https://aussie.zone/comment/5073286

      (In case that comment disappears for any reason, though:

      Particularly there is this report: https://www.safeworkaustralia.gov.au/sites/default/files/2023-02/decision_ris_-_managing_the_risks_of_crystalline_silica_at_work_-_for_publication_pdf.pdf

      But broadly, engineered stone is significantly different because of both its composition and how it’s used. The proof of the pudding, though, is that with its rise in popularity we’ve also seen the rise of these ‘acute accelerated’ cases of silicosis.)