• Greyghoster
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    You probably grew up in the era of digital clocks and watches. If you used an analog watch you would know why it was easier to say a quarter to 10. 😁

    • BirdyBoogleBop@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      To make me show up 30 minutes late because I misheard it as quarter past 10?

      Way easier to just say and understand 9:45 with whatever clock you use.

      • Greyghoster
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        No it means that they grew up using a 12 hour, 60 minute circular time system. Habits form when you learn stuff and can last a lifetime.

        • schmidtster@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Most people I know would simply say 9:45 instead of 1/4 to 10 when looking at an analog clock. We were taught to mentally do some minor math, same habits, just better I guess.

          • Greyghoster
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Just different and from a different school of thought. If you consider the convenience of conveying how close the time is to the hour, it’s actually a quick shorthand. I can see you don’t like it however it’s just the way people think of time. It’s not like they can’t do the math because if they have a digital clock they have to convert 9:45 into a quarter to 10. It’s the way they think about time.

            • schmidtster@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’s what is laziest and easiest for them. Some people are simply taught to think of others while conversing instead of just themselves.

              • Greyghoster
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                View it from their perspective, they all converse perfectly together because that’s how everyone told the time however other people want to change the rules. They aren’t being rude or impolite just using the system they grew up with.

      • BOMBS@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        For me, it’s because when I look at an analog clock, it’s easier to see that there’s a quarter of the cycle left on the minute hand than to convert 9 to 45 mins. So if someone asks me for the time and I looked at an analog clock, I would be more likely to respond with the relative position of the minute hand than with the exact minutes. If I am looking at a digital clock, then I will read exactly what the clock says.

        • Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          This is the correct explanation. Having grown up in a house full of analog clocks and preferring them still today, it’s hard for me to understand the difficulty so many people have using analog, or why it’s hard to interpret the logic used in conveying it. But it really is just a matter of immersion and perspective. People who prefer analog appear to perceive time in fractions and circular cycles. Half to/past, quarter to/past, etc. are how we actually view and perceive the day. It’s more than just a number.

          • BOMBS@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            It’s more than just a number.

            I like the way you explained it. This is how it feels when I interpret time from an analog clock.