Was thinking the same.

Only the stuff you put in the microwave.

Well the American people voted for instability now they and the rest of the world will need to sit back with popcorn and watch.

There are many official reports and this is yet another that we don’t act on.

No shit?! This has only just come to light?

Another way to look at it is a tax on fossil fuels. Increase the cost of fossil fuels and you increase the cost of things that use them! A carbon tax!

It’s about CEOs and profits not consumers.

Certainly both however the cost of home batteries is very high and anything that can reduce it would be useful. This is especially true of being able to absorb surplus solar energy for use later. Size and weight are not the major issue with static batteries but cost is.

Not in Australia where it is illegal for the police to touch your phone.

Wouldn’t batteries for homes and communities be a better target?

It’s what the American people wanted. They knew what he was.

Interesting. The article doesn’t actually say that fluoridation in water supplies is dangerous but that some researchers are questioning. Generally code for lack of scientific evidence. It also finds that early studies may have had a flawed basis (pretty much all early studies have been found wanting by later scientists) but doesn’t refute the results.The study mentioned in the article talks about high levels of fluoridation which I assume is in lab tests however these levels are not the case in water supplies.

The correct way forward is more actual science based studies.

It’s always been a football in that LNP and now Labor want it to solve investment issues. Same with Super.

The sad part is that a technological society built ethically might be sustainable however we’ve blown it with run away climate change.

Apparently endless growth is a good thing. How the planet is supposed to continue to provide and survive a continuous expansion of Homo sapiens is beyond me. The only way out is to decrease population growth and refactor the world economy away from endless growth.

Yet they want to vote for Trump?

Linux anyone?

What you say is true though my point is that to many bean counters, research should only be done on something that addresses the current bottom line. It’s this type of view that conservatives take to heart and it’s why they tend to try to stifle higher education and research institutions.

This is really to the point: “That’s a little bit like telling someone who’s got a large drinking habit or smoking habit, ‘you need to quit that as soon as possible.’”. We know we have the life threatening habit but can’t stop the addiction!

There are republicans that are making notes for the future.