• iviattendurefort@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    109
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Edge of Tomorrow. Not a huge Tom Cruise fan, but that one really gets me. Emily Blunt is awesome in it. Went in not expecting much, but I was blown away.

    Watched it last year and immediately searched to see if there was sequel in the pipe. Development hell.

      • pangolinpalantir@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        In the book there are some references to Rita (Emily Blunt) fighting in various places and I think her getting her start in South America. Might be remembering that one wrong, but a prequel with her learning how to fight the monsters would have been good if they stuck more to the book.

  • KinNectar@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    109
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Constantine. Keanu Reeves has said he would like to do it, and there is a ton of story material to draw from between the Constantine series and all of the Hellblazers, not to mention cameos in other series.

  • hactar42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    100
    ·
    1 year ago

    The Fifth Element

    I’m glad it didn’t get a sequel because it is such a good stand alone movie. I’m just shocked the studio didn’t try to milk it for everything it had.

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy.

    It was good. It was written by Douglas Adams. He also wrote screenplays for the next 2 books to be made into movies.

    And despite it making a couple million more than it cost, the first one was considered a flop. :(

    • Mugmoor@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      Thay movie was awful. As a huge fan of the series, I don’t know how anyone can watch it and understand the plot without being familiar with it beforehand.

      The BBC series is much better, and goes up to Book 3 iirc.

      • GrayBackgroundMusic@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I disagree. I loved the film. I remember it fondly.

        Do you like the books? I find that people who like or have read the books tend not to like the movie and vice versa. I do not like the books.

          • Doubleohdonut@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah the way I see it is that even Douglas himself didn’t quite have a single vision in his mind about the story, which is why there are so many iterations (radio, book, movie, tv series, musical? Am I forgetting anything?)

        • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          The funny thing about THHGttG is that it exists several times simultaneously with wildly different canons. The original BBC radio show was the original, then they did the TV miniseries with much of the same talent (Mostly replacing Susan Sheridan with Sandra Dickenson as Trillian), THEN the book pentology, THEN the 2005 movie. They all start pretty similarly with Arthur’s house and the pub and the Vogons, but then they go into all kinds of different directions in different orders.

          • loobkoob@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            For me personally, the plot doesn’t matter all that much anyway. What I love is Douglas Adams’ prose - the plot’s mostly just a vehicle for that - and I feel that doesn’t really translate to film. The perfect example:

            The ships hung in the sky in much the same way that bricks don’t.

            It’s funny. It’s succinct. It’s very descriptive. It doesn’t just tell you that the ships were hovering, it draws comparison to bricks which conjures up images of blocky, inelegant ships, and it gives the impression that the way they’re just stationary in the sky is somewhat unsettling or surreal. I think it’s quite impressive how much such a short sentence manages to convey really!

            Translating it to film, and having shot of some blocky, inelegant ships hanging in the sky, doesn’t manage to capture the same humour or feeling that that short sentence in the book does, at least for me. And it’s the same throughout the whole series, but that line is probably the easiest example to bring up. Some books translate really well to film and the imagery in the film ends up being far better than what I could imagine myself on the fly, but that’s not the case with Hitchhiker’s Guide at all.

            The Hitchhiker’s Guide radio series has a fair amount of narration so the prose still shines through in that.

            I had similar issues with the various Dirk Gently adaptations, too. And I find I have the same issue with screen adaptations of Terry Pratchett’s work for similar reasons. Without Adams’ or Pratchett’s wonderful prose, it often tends to feel very B-movie-esque to me.

    • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It was ok. Didn’t understand the side story with John Malkovich at all, pointless. And Zoey Deschanel was terrible as Trillen, like criminally awful at the role to the point she ruined it for me. Sam Rockwell was perfect casting though, same with mos Def and Martin Freeman

    • Mostly_Gristle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m surprised it’s never been made into a decent TV show. The entire thing has already been made into half-hour radio shows, so the scripts are there and road tested. It’s basically halfway done already.

  • Jonathan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m not necessarily surprised this one didn’t get a sequel, but I really wish it had!

    Event Horizon (1997)

        • Hugin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          The theory is basically that in 40k ftl works by sending the ship through the warp (hell). Humans use a Gellar field to keep a bubble of reality around the ship while in the warp. The theory is this is humanities firstf tll so they don’t know they need a Gellar field.

          It’s fun but other then the ftl is hell doesn’t fit at all with the rest of 40k lore.

      • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        It was apparently too intense for test audiences, and this was in the pre-DVD-special-features era when no one bothered to keep cut footage. Maybe they cut too much. I watched it recently because I had heard fantastic things and I was just… generally unimpressed. It was an interesting concept that really wasn’t very well explored, and the writing was so stiff.

      • Jonathan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I would love to see some sort of remastered directors cut of that movie. It has definitely started showing its age, but it’s still high up on my list of great movies.

    • magnetosphere@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      I read something about that a while ago. If I recall correctly, it was intended to be a franchise, but Master and Commander was so incredibly expensive that they decided against it.

    • planetaryprotection@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      In 2021 there was some planning/writing done for a prequel, but I don’t think anything came of it.

      That film is having a bit of a cultural comeback, so there’s still hope.

      • That’s good to hear. I haven’t read any of the books (not my preferred literary genre) so I didn’t have a preconception of the Aubrey character. This sadly left me loving Russell Crow as Aubrey, and I’ll have a hard time with anyone else playing him. Crow is 59, now; he might still be able to get away with it.

    • ours@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      And there’s a whole bunch of more books to be adapted. That movie was so perfectly done I wish it had worked enough to allow a whole series of sequels.

  • Ixoid@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Alita: Battle Angel. I’ve heard there is a sequel planned, but it’s been a few years since the first movie. James Cameron is still involved as a producer, but I guess his blue-skinned money machine has kept him busy lately.

    • RunningInRVA@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Really? The movie was the handout for the people who were pissed the series didn’t last longer. Asking for a second movie is a nonstarter, even if the first was good.

      • TheDoctorDonna@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Wouldn’t watch anything from Joss at this point anyways. 10 years ago I would have been all over a Firefly reboot or another movie, but Joss kinda dug his own grave on that by being a total piece of shit. And then after rewatching Buffy/ Angel, and Firefly so many times I realized that they are just the same stories and same characters with some different actors.

        Serenity was the best thing Joss ever wrote and it was essentially a pity fuck.

      • Brutticus@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Which, honestly, to be 100 percent honest, it wasn’t. I hated the movie. I understand its my fatal flaw, but I look at works holistically. One of the things that got me into firefly was it’s pacing; the promise that everything was going to have room to breathe. I would rather just have the first season; the movie crammed plot threads and character arcs meant to sustain an entire 5 season series into a 2 hour movie. Except its worse, because I got to see what the slow burn was like.

  • Nefara@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Still waiting for the Zootopia sequel. Genuinely good and creative movie that used the format to talk about tricky topics with some cushion and then became a cult favorite. They added some extra stuff under Zootopia+, they tee’d up the buddy cop format, did all this world building and then… what, Disney, this is the one IP you’re not going to squeeze for all its worth? Where’s the next one?

  • Mokopa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    1 year ago

    Master and commander… They had the ship built already too - why not make a sequel? There’s about 20 books worth of material.