• Dogs_cant_look_up@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is probably the worst take I’ve ever heard. It’s actually amazing how much i disagree with almost everything you’ve written here.

      And, Tom Hanks is still acting, Tom Hanks is literally this generations Tom Hanks.

      There’s so much excellent acting and directing in the world at the moment i just can’t fathom how you have come to your conclusions.

      • dudebro@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m sorry, we’re just going to have to agree to disagree.

        Hope you like the new marvel movie coming out.

        • FatCrab@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes, only marvel movies come out now. Everything else is actually banned at the moment. Christ, your takes are fucking awful.

    • funkless@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Banshees of Inisherin? The Whale? Everything Everywhere All At Once? Succession? The Bear?

      There’s loads of great acting out there. Maybe the issue is you’re buying tickets to Chris Pratt instead of other things?

      • dudebro@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m not saying they don’t exist.

        But every big-name, big budget release these days is almost guaranteed to be trash.

        That wasn’t always the case. It’s only that way now because people’s standards are so low.

        • pineapplefriedrice@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The big name movies now are so cringeworthy and require zero thought on the part of the viewer. I’d be almost embarrassed to go watch them. The worst part is that I used to watch them because there was just nothing else to see, until one day I was so bored that I walked out of the theatre. To my surprise, I was even approached and given a refund by the manager without asking… maybe they watched it too and understood the pain.

          • vimdiesel@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            You are equating “big name” with quality. That has almost never been true since movie blockbusters became a thing. Go ask any movie history buff/expert. You are very wrong if you think blockbusters were some kind of artsy tear jerkering, mind bending, raved over by critics products. They’ve almost always been formulaic.

            • TheActualDevil@sffa.community
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              But the first blockbuster movie is an arthouse masterpiece that really makes you look deep within yourself and wonder how big a shark could actually be.

              Jaws. It was Jaws.

      • pineapplefriedrice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        But are those the things that get marketing? I’m with you on loving that content, but none of the main theatres in my area (a city of 7 million) even show them. A couple will put them into the standard screen theatres at oddball times to fulfill their contracts, but the good content is in the local dollar theatres where, of course, the movie gets less traffic.

        I think what they’re saying is that the movies that you’re “supposed” to watch are things like those god awful Harry Potter prequels (literally any fanfic amateur could have written them better), the ten thousandth Marvel movie (seriously, just stop), or those Adam-Sandler style low effort white trash movies that run solely on the recognition of the probably male and supposedly “so talented” lead actor.

        • tormeh@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          When most people pick movies to watch in a theatre it’s typically based on which movie no one will object to. So it needs a bit of action, a bit of romance, a bit of comedy… It also needs to have brand/actor recognition. So you get Marvel. There’s nothing wrong with this, but it’s a different market from the one you’re in.

      • pineapplefriedrice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        But are those the things that get marketing? I’m with you on loving that content, but none of the main theatres in my area (a city of 7 million) even show them. A couple will put them into the standard screen theatres at oddball times to fulfill their contracts, but the good content is in the local dollar theatres where, of course, the movie gets less traffic.

        I think what they’re saying is that the movies that you’re “supposed” to watch are things like those god awful Harry Potter prequels (literally any fanfic amateur could have written them better), the ten thousandth Marvel movie (seriously, just stop), or those Adam-Sandler style low effort white trash movies that run solely on the recognition of the probably male and supposedly “so talented” lead actor.

    • vimdiesel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      As a gen X I can tell you that quality is not down and that you have tunnel vision. Go watch some 80s/90s shows lmao. Most are garbage, with only a few gems. It has definitely gotten better as competition increased.

      • evatronic@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        There’s a bit of a point there, though. As summarized by Futurama,

        Fry: Married? Jenny can’t get married.

        Leela: Why not? It’s clever, it’s unexpected.

        Fry: But that’s not why people watch TV. Clever things make people feel stupid, and unexpected things make them feel scared.

        Hollywood caters to what people want. What people want is often not “good”.

      • Kale@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        We remember the good movies and forget the schlock. We remember 1976 as “Taxi Driver” and not “The Gumball Rally”.

    • bassomitron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Chris Pratt is definitely not a great actor, he’s mediocre at best. However, he’s in tons of blockbuster movies so that’s why he’s popular, not necessarily because people think he’s talented.

      The other stuff you said is just nonsense. There are tons of great, well written, acted, and directed movies. You just have to look outside the mainstream/blockbuster releases. If you only focus on the big releases from major studios like Disney, then yeah you’ll think that it’s nothing but shallow garbage. But there’s way more content nowadays, so it’s harder to sift thru the massive diluge of content out there.

    • Snekeyes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Um. So watch other languages. They have integrity and.no coke. Cause coke actors… they are low paid and have to stay up and beat their bodies down to get paid.

      Got it. This is fascinating fabrications Your imaginations almost rivals your thoughts.