• timicin@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    they don’t even have to be from trump.

    so much of my extended family came over without papers, but managed to get them and now they want that trump wall built and want immigrants banned and the last election proves that it’s a common thread among all latinos.

    most of the ones in rural texas and suburban florida like trump; every one else hates him and there’s no in between somehow; but hating on new immigrants is common everywhere.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yeah it’s such a weird attitude because I bet they didn’t come over the border. The vast majority of illegal immigration into the United States comes from people overstaying their visas, I don’t see what a wall is going to do to stop that. Well I do see what a wall is going to do to stop that, nothing at all.

      As they say a 30 ft wall can be beaten by 31 ft ladder, but equally you could just take the plane flying at 12,000 ft

      • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        “If we can eliminate suffering why did I suffer?” A lot of people justify their trials and tribulations as well as a coping mechanism, but eliminating them dimmishing the copeing.

        • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Pretty much. It’s the “kids have it so easy these days” resentment. The “I suffered, so they should too” mentality. People tell themselves that their suffering made them stronger because it helps them cope with the fact that their life fucking sucked for a while. Or they tell themselves that they were able to come out on top through sheer willpower, (even if there was a lot of luck/nepotism/etc involved too,) so anyone else should be able to as well.

        • Maeve@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s true. So much suffering is needless and pointless and rather than accept that and work to eliminate needless, pointless suffering for others, which is exactly what would make suffering meaningful, so many would make sure others suffer worse. It’s sick. We need healing but that doesn’t serve billionaires, or capitalism.

      • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Empathy, and how it relates to fairness.

        Consider the premise: “I had to suffer to get where I am today.” Disregarding nuance, there are two polarized takes when confronted with improvement of the situations:

        • I suffered and so should the next guy.
        • I don’t want anyone to suffer like I did.

        We see a stark difference in outlook, but it’s hard to see a justification. My theory is that it has to do with fairness. Watch this:

        • I suffered and so should the next guy, it’s only fair.
        • I don’t want anyone to suffer like I did, what I experienced was unfair.

        I think this is the thinking that explains everyone’s observations, while letting everyone maintain some degree of rationality. The trick is not about whether or not someone empathizes at all, but rather how they prioritize empathy with respect to their own suffering. From there one determines what is fair or unfair about past and future events.

      • Throwaway@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        The reasoning I heard is they left for a cultural reason, and they dont want culture they left that coming in.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I work with immigrants mostly on work visas, and they all seem to support stricter immigration controls. Look at Vivek Ramiswamy, his parents are immigrants and he’s hardcore about restricting immigration.

      They’re just pulling the ladder up behind themselves…

      That said, there are others, like Nikki Haley (I think her parents are immigrants too), who take a much more reasonable approach to make it easier to come legally and harder to come illegally. I don’t like her other policies, but it’s nice seeing a Republican from an immigrant family oppose Trump and his stupid border policies.

      • boomzilla@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I yesterday read that one of the Koch Brothers endorses her run for presidency and wants her to prevent Trumps resurgence. Although I wouldn’t vote GOP (I favoured Bernie 2016) it seems she’s reasonable and the minor evil.

        I’m from Europe so excuse me if I got smth wrong.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          She’s way better than Trump, and perhaps the only Republican I’d consider voting for. I don’t like her policies, but she is rare in that she doesn’t like Trump and imo has the capability to steer the GOP away from MAGA nonsense.

          However, I think her policies suck in general. So I’d be voting for her for two reasons: she opposes Trump and she is kinda reasonable about immigration.

          I don’t think she has much of a chance this election (we’ll see), but she does feel like a return to the old GOP that I didn’t hate with the firey passion of a thousand suns.

          I’ll probably vote third party because my state will vote for the GOP candidate regardless by at least 20%, but I’ll probably switch my affiliation to R to vote for her in the primaries.