• neclimdul@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not sure how support doesn’t fall under “preserve, protect and defend” in every way that’s meaningful

    • stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      1 year ago

      That is the sophistry part. It clearly was intended to be a higher level of oath that included the lower one. Watch: SCOTUS will say that the president actually doesn’t have to support the Constitution.