jeffw@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · edit-21 year agoYou’re more likely to go to prison for exposing animal cruelty than for committing itwww.vox.comexternal-linkmessage-square210fedilinkarrow-up1901arrow-down151file-text
arrow-up1850arrow-down1external-linkYou’re more likely to go to prison for exposing animal cruelty than for committing itwww.vox.comjeffw@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · edit-21 year agomessage-square210fedilinkfile-text
Not really sure what to put here…I usually put relevant excerpts, but that got this post deleted for doing that
minus-squareImFresh3x@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down7·1 year agoMy eyes don’t define crime. That’s not how it works. The law defines it. And the court looks at the law. I’m not a child so I understand this.
minus-squareLongpork_afficianado@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down2·1 year agoDo you consider Harriet Tubman a criminal too?
minus-squareHalosheep@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down3·1 year agoEthically no, legally yes? That’s sort of just how laws work. Legal doesn’t mean good.
minus-squareLongpork_afficianado@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoSo why do we need to differentiate between “arrested for exposing abuse” and “arrested for breaking unjust laws in the process of exposing abuse”?
My eyes don’t define crime. That’s not how it works. The law defines it. And the court looks at the law. I’m not a child so I understand this.
Do you consider Harriet Tubman a criminal too?
Ethically no, legally yes?
That’s sort of just how laws work. Legal doesn’t mean good.
Removed by mod
So why do we need to differentiate between “arrested for exposing abuse” and “arrested for breaking unjust laws in the process of exposing abuse”?
Removed by mod