The poll found 50% of Democrats approve of how Biden has navigated the conflict while 46% disapprove — and the two groups diverge substantially in their views of U.S. support for Israel. Biden’s support on the issue among Democrats is down slightly from August, as an AP-NORC poll conducted then found that 57% of Democrats approved of his handling of the conflict and 40% disapproved.

  • Sambarkjand@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    30
    ·
    1 year ago

    “The terrorists are using schools as shields though!”

    “Oh damn that’s a genius strategy. Better just give up every military advantage I have and send in my soldiers to be ambushed.”

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nope, by definition isn’t.

        Still more dangerous for the IDF and less vengeance-effective than just raining death on thousands of civilians on the off-chance that you might also kill a handful of terrorists that Hamas can easily replace.

        • dx1@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes, and that touches on the core problem, unequal regard for human lives.

          • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, to quote Rashida Tlaib from right before they censured her for speaking truth to power:

            I can’t believe we have to say this, but Palestinian people are not disposable. We are human beings just like anyone else. Speaking up to save lives no matter faith, no matter ethnicity should not be controversial. The cries of the Palestinian and Israeli children sound no different to me. What I don’t understand is why the cries of Palestinian children sound different to you all.

        • hanekam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Still more dangerous for the IDF and less vengeance-effective than just raining death on thousands of civilians on the off-chance that you might also kill a handful of terrorists that Hamas can easily replace.

          Do you feel your description matches the reality of this Palestinian dentist? Are the described actions consistent with callously raining death on thousands of civilians?

      • Sambarkjand@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        19
        ·
        1 year ago

        This may be tough to understand but there’s a ton of still completely-intact, dense urban environment in between the border and the school in your scenario. So on your way to the school, you can be ambushed.

        Or hey, maybe thinking strategically even a little bit, maybe the school, or the road, or any of the surroundings are booby-trapped! Maybe they’ve planted IEDs or mines on the path there!

        It’s very far fetched, I know. Humans haven’t been waging war for forever, there isn’t a giant history to pull from.