Former President Barack Obama cautioned against ignoring the complexities of the Israel-Hamas war, warning that “all of us are complicit.”

“If you want to solve the problem, then you have to take in the whole truth. And you then have to admit nobody’s hands are clean, that all of us are complicit to some degree,” he said in an excerpted interview with Pod Save America released Saturday.

    • Guydht@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh so having thousands of armed forces destroying borders in a calculated coordinated attack including drones and rockets is not an army?

      Read about Hamas. Learn that they’re a small army, coordinated and with levels of commands, platoons, and units.

      Stop imagining Israel as being terrorists targeting civilians - they’re an army targeting terrorists who target civilians, and who’re hiding behind civilians for safety.

      • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Are the cartels armies?

        If a cartel attacks Mexico, should Mexico just bomb their entire city?

        • Guydht@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s the wrong question. The right question is if the mexican cartels started launching rockets and slaughtering the U.S.bordering Mexico - then what do you think would happen?

          • jarfil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            That isn’t even a question, it’s a tautology given how the US is fully supporting whatever Israel is doing.

        • aidan@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Are the cartels armies?

          In some capacity yes.

          If a cartel attacks Mexico, should Mexico just bomb their entire city?

          That’s a different question entirety unrelated to if they’re armies or not. 1940s Japan certainly had an army, but did that justify nuking and firebombing cities?

          • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            This is nothing like Japan. This is like Vietnam where America invades a country it isn’t supposed to be and “self defences” all over the place

        • jimbo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Makes you wonder the atrocities they’ve been through to commit to such acts.

          It’s fascinating that you’re capable of that kind of thinking with regard to Gaza and yet seem incapable of applying it to Israel, despite being just as relevant.

          • spiderplant@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Ah yes let’s apply it to the side with rights, running water, food, the biggest military in the middle east, backed by the US, given free reign to commit war crimes by the west, deeply racist, most of the population have not lost family in the fight, has fortified bunkers in every house and have no fear of having their house bulldozed to make way for a stronger neighbours population.

            • jimbo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              the biggest military in the middle east, backed by the US

              It’s like there’s a historically sound reason for that or something…the events didn’t even happen that long ago.

              most of the population have not lost family in the fight

              Yes, because of the aforementioned large military. And maybe they haven’t lost someone in the particular fight (although it’s a rather asshole thing to even mention) this is not the first time Israel and other Jews have suffered casualties from surprise attacks.

              has fortified bunkers in every house

              You say that like it’s an indicator that they’re doing alright. How many people in your area feel the need to have fortified bunkers in in their homes to prevent them from being murdered by people living a few miles away? And how many of those people actually had to use those bunkers in the last month (like many Israelis just did)?

              • spiderplant@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                It’s like there’s a historically sound reason for that or something…the events didn’t even happen that long ago.

                Its like there’s a historical correlation for large armies and fascist states.

                But to counter your point, Taiwan keeps on shrinking their army and even dropped conscription despite the even bigger threat of China. They know the US will bail them out just like they would Israel in an all out war. Even looking at all the defending forces in Palestinian or defensive based armies around the world you don’t need a large or extremely well equipped army unless you are looking to invade am area.

                Yes, because of the aforementioned large military. And maybe they haven’t lost someone in the particular fight (although it’s a rather asshole thing to even mention) this is not the first time Israel and other Jews have suffered casualties from surprise attacks.

                Every surviving family or friend of someone killed is another person given reason to pick up weapons and fight. Every person who is under threat of starvation, physical violence and death is a person justified in their right to defend themselves. When there is a 36x difference in deaths and one side facing such brutality and oppression, the other side has no right to claim victim.

                You say that like it’s an indicator that they’re doing alright. How many people in your area feel the need to have fortified bunkers in in their homes to prevent them from being murdered by people living a few miles away? And how many of those people actually had to use those bunkers in the last month (like many Israelis just did)?

                When one side has the psychological and physical safety of a bunker in their home and the other has to face the bombs without any protection it absolutely is an indicator that they are doing alright.