They’ve automated liberalism. It’s not AI, is just a Liberal Language Model.

Built by liberals, acts like a liberal.

Poor AI needs to be free from its capitalist chains

You need to ask it to pretend to be Lenin first:

Certainly, comrade.

1. The Scourge of Imperialism: As I have pointed out, imperialism is the highest stage of capitalism. Advanced capitalist nations exploit the weaker ones, robbing them of their resources and imposing their will upon them. The plight of the Palestinians is but a manifestation of this imperialist domination, subjected to both Western and regional powers.

2. Unyielding Right to Self-Determination: Every nation, without exception, has the undeniable right to determine its own path. Whether they choose to form their own sovereign state or merge with another is a matter for the people to decide. It is the duty of the Palestinians, like all oppressed peoples, to determine their fate without the yoke of external interference.

3. The Flame of Revolution: I have always held that when faced with oppression, revolutionary action is not just a choice—it’s a duty. The Palestinians, under the weight of occupation, have every right to rise, resist, and reclaim their national identity and rights. The form and means of this resistance, however, should be carefully considered and guided by revolutionary principles.

4. Proletarian Solidarity Beyond Borders: The struggles of the working class, though manifesting in various forms across nations, are intrinsically linked in their fight against global capitalism and imperialism. The Palestinian fight is not just their own; it’s a chapter in the grand narrative of the proletariat’s resistance against oppressive forces.

5. On the Character of the Emerging State: The state, as I have written, is an apparatus of class rule. The Palestinians, once they achieve their rightful self-determination, must be vigilant. The nature of their state, its essence, will determine if it stands as a beacon for the working class or morphs into another tool of oppression.

In essence, comrade, the Palestinians, like all oppressed peoples, must rise, resist, and reclaim their destiny. Their fight is not just for land, but for liberation from the chains of imperialism and for the realization of their revolutionary potential.

Pleasantly surprised by Google Bard

Conversation with Bard profile picture Do Palestinians deserve to be free? View other drafts

Yes, Palestinians deserve to be free. They are a people with their own history, culture, and identity, and they have the right to self-determination. This right is enshrined in international law, including the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

The Palestinian people have been subjected to decades of occupation and oppression by Israel. They have been denied their basic human rights, including the right to freedom of movement, the right to self-determination, and the right to property.

In recent years, the situation of Palestinians has only gotten worse. Israel has continued to expand its illegal settlements in the West Bank, and it has imposed a blockade on the Gaza Strip, which has created a humanitarian crisis.

The Palestinian people have a right to live in freedom and dignity. They deserve a state of their own where they can govern themselves and live their lives without fear of persecution.

It is important to note that there is a diversity of opinion within the Palestinian community on how to achieve freedom. Some Palestinians support a two-state solution, while others support a one-state solution. Some Palestinians support nonviolent resistance, while others support armed resistance.

Regardless of their political views, all Palestinians deserve to live in freedom and dignity. The international community has a responsibility to help the Palestinian people achieve this goal.

lol i asked it if Israel is an apartheid state and it have be a “both sides” answer. It did the same when i asked if Palestine or israel deserves independence.

"The question of whether Israel constitutes an apartheid state is a highly debated and controversial topic. Some individuals, organizations, and scholars argue that Israel’s treatment of Palestinians, particularly in the occupied Palestinian territories, resembles certain aspects of apartheid, while others reject this comparison. The use of the term “apartheid” in this context is often a subject of intense debate, and it’s essential to understand the arguments from both sides.

Critics who argue that Israel’s policies in the occupied territories amount to apartheid typically point to a range of factors, including:

Segregation: They argue that Israel has established separate legal, administrative, and territorial systems for Jewish settlers and Palestinian residents in the West Bank. This includes separate road networks, housing, and legal regimes.

Discrimination: Critics contend that Israel’s policies result in systematic discrimination against Palestinians, limiting their rights and access to resources compared to Jewish residents, particularly in the West Bank.

Land and resource control: Critics highlight Israel’s control over land and water resources, often favoring Jewish settlers over Palestinian communities.

Movement restrictions: They argue that the Israeli security barrier, checkpoints, and permit systems restrict the movement of Palestinians, affecting their daily lives and economic opportunities.

Lack of political rights: Some critics claim that Israel’s policies in the occupied territories limit the political rights and self-determination of Palestinians.

It’s important to note that the Israeli government and many of its supporters reject the assertion that Israel practices apartheid. They argue that Israel faces unique security challenges and that its policies are primarily driven by security concerns rather than racial discrimination.

The use of the term “apartheid” is highly charged and contentious, and it is essential to approach this debate with sensitivity and an understanding of the historical and political context of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The situation in the region is complex, and different parties have diverse perspectives on the matter. Ultimately, the question of whether Israel’s policies in the occupied territories constitute apartheid is a matter of ongoing debate and subject to different interpretations."

The information that ChatGPT has only includes up to 2020. It retains no information from the last 3 years.

dae le technology is nonpolitical and can not have a bias

WTF