Sen. John Fetterman (D-Penn.) called some of his colleagues’ quickness to blame Israel for the hospital blast in Gaza “disturbing” in a statement Wednesday.

“It’s truly disturbing that Members of Congress rushed to blame Israel for the hospital tragedy in Gaza,” Fetterman said in a post on X, formerly Twitter.

  • SCB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    it fits their MO

    Israel consistently does whatever it can to minimize civilian casualties, up to and including assuming more risk for their own soldiers and civilians

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Except it provably isn’t. Calling for evacuations before military strikes is an easy and obvious example.

        Allowing Hamas to bombard them with thousands of rockets for years is another really obvious one that no one ever seems to recognize.

        • be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/israel-palestine-war-gaza-area-bombed-after-warning-to-move

          https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/israel-bombs-egypt-border-crossing-it-had-touted-as-an-escape-route-for-besieged-palestinians/ar-AA1hYfk2

          Calling for evacuations before military strikes is an easy and obvious example.

          Man, I’m not going to get into a tit for tat with you. Hamas has blood on their hands. That doesn’t mean I’m going to pretend Israel doesn’t.

          I’m in my 50’s; this is at least the third or fourth time I can remember having the reaction of “Wow, Israel gives no shits who they hurt” during an event like this.

          How about those illegal settlements which are a 24/7/365 provocation?

          Hamas isn’t innocent, but Israel damn sure isn’t either.

            • be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Read what I quoted from your comment, and tell me which of the links I posted supports it.

              The rest is just because I had my dander up at the continuous implication from some that we’re supposed to support Israel uncritically.

              • SCB@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Endeavoring to minimize civilian casualties does not mean there will not be civilian casualties.

                The argument that Israel is aiming for civilian casualties is nonsensical.

                • be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  So you didn’t read the articles or you claim they are false?

                  Edited to add - I know the cartoon inserted was from a previous time we were all shaking our head at Israel, but that’s exactly what it looks like overall.

                  Edited again to say - at best they are giving lip service to watching out for civilians but taking no care to actually do so. I reject the premise that this would have been a proportional response even if I believed they actually were trying not to hit them. I don’t think the folks calling the shots care whatsoever about civilians being on the other end.

                  I also think they haven’t considered what actions belong in the “Guaranteed” category when considering actions that are 100% going to create additional generations who feel they have a legitimate reason for future acts of violence against Israel.