• oDDmON@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well. That was depressing.

    Add a dash of climate change with a twist of wildfire and call it an apocalypse.

  • PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This is literally how the US budgets its defense spending. How many of x do we need to fight China and Russia at the same time at their front door.

    Edit: I should probably say equipment reserves (planes and shit) because there’s a lot of dark money shit in there.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Articles like this are just prepper wanking oil.

    The US is not duking it out with any of these countries. China is too busy making all the world’s plastic shit, and Russia’s only weapon is the ghost of Cold War past.

    • YⓄ乙
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yep and US is the saint trying to fix world hunger and eliminate poverty.

  • zerfuffle@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    US needs more ways to justify their obscene military spending in lieu of things that actually benefit American citizens

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    What is Russia going to do? All of their best military units are already dead both in terms of hardware and personnel.

    The Russians have already gone up against Western hardware and lost so we’ve essentially had a preview of the war except no Western forces have been engaged in that war. So apparently Russia is going to attack an enemy who is at full fighting strength when they themselves are severely depleted and are actually at this very moment relying on drafting.

  • Acedelgado@artemis.camp
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    America is more than ready, considering how much we spend on the military. This article is a few years old, and definitely sensationalist, but is still an interesting read-

    https://www.wearethemighty.com/mighty-trending/how-long-the-us-military-would-last-against-the-rest-of-the-world/

    And on top of that, the US Army just started deploying robotic troop carriers, and is finishing up remote combat vehicles for the front lines so that first contact isn’t with soldiers. Yes, we’re going to have killer robots on the front line. And soon.

    • atetulo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They aren’t even playing world police.

      Playing world police would be doing things like helping Venezuelans.

      I guarantee you, every modern instance you can think of where America is “playing world police” is actually a calculated effort to maintain its global interests. Or at least, the global interests of its ruling class.

  • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    So the RAND Corp 2025 plans for China are coming close, aren’t they? It is cute that USA thinks they will even manage to survive if China coupled with some Russian aid.

    US military is shit, as seen in their many false flag expeditions over decades, and are more about being flashy in TV and news media owned by themselves. US throws money stolen from other countries, and most of their actual weapon output is ineffective.

  • Uvine_Umarylis@partizle.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ehh, instead work with the EU & UK and offer their logistics network so they can handle Ukraine, secretly provide Taiwan nuclear warheads & start a Cuban missile crisis 2 & force a real conversation.

    Pacific too risky? Expand A2AD capabilities to Asian allies en masse, it’s gonna all be defensive wars after all

    We (Americans) should not basically have to pay for their defense

    • OurToothbrush@lemmy.mlM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      provide Taiwan nuclear warheads & start a Cuban missile crisis 2

      I didn’t realize that China had put nuclear missiles so close to the US, similar to the way the US put missiles in Turkey, where are they?

      • Uvine_Umarylis@partizle.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Why would we be negotiating for that??? There is no point in range anymore.

        Instead, we’ll be negotiating for shipping rights to grade B Chinese ghost city apartments & skyscrapers to bring to the USA on the cheap!!!

        They have a lessened property crisis, we have more housing for cheap that wasn’t built by our evil & corrupt government lol, everyone wins!!!

        Likely though we’d just end up negotiating the removal of nuclear weapons over a final arrangement for Taiwan’s independence or some variation of subservience (think China’s 9 points plan 1981 but with more brexit North Ireland vibes), fentanyl precursors to Mexico, and a potential final arrangement for the Korean peninsula’s path to unification, boo

    • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      You AmeriKKKans will pay for everything with pleasure and gratitude, when US military is shipped in cold storage via DHL.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    25
    ·
    1 year ago

    Anyone trying to invade the US has to understand that besides the military and law enforcement, there are 330 million people with 400 million guns.

    Good luck!