You being a crybully piece of shit and getting called out for being a crybully piece of shit isn’t misandry. You truly are not all men. Which is fortunate.
Bravo, you have solved the problem. * dusts hands *
Comparing my removed comment versus the other person’s comment on the post reveals nearly identical tendencies, which seems to be a point amusingly missed.
If my complaint about treating men equally and not shitting on all men is a misogynistic issue, I probably am not going to listen to whoever calls me that. Real misogyny is when women’s rights are attacked, NOT when men ask to be treated the same as what women preach with feminism.
You are telling me to go become a redpiller/Tateist lol.
Jordan Peterson once said “clean your room, bucko.” That doesn’t mean that cleaning a room is automatically a bad idea. Likewise, you must have some terrible grasp of lived reality if you think the only reason to not sulk and be passive-aggressive all the time is because of what a human trafficker might have said once.
Rather be calm and not listen
You keep replying. You keep carrying that cross you built for yourself.
than swing myself in any direction
You’re freefalling in a self-inflicted rightward direction and fooling no one here.
When my politics is almost wholly leftist, both socially and politically, with my only complaint regarding men’s rights being given equal treatment as that of women (and not shitting on all men), and NOT some woman harming/suppressing that misogyny label implies, I fail to see how I can be a rightwinger. That label is used to scare men into a certain kind of leftist moral compliance, which is not the problem with me.
This is precisely why I find myself always taking a step back whenever I end up aligning with the socialist left on social politics. Everytime it is about cis het men self improvement or working out, it becomes about rightwing, redpill or whatever stereotypes you people want everyone to pigeonhole in. If that does not work, cancel, call the man a misogynist and done, hands dusted, no social consideration for men.
Sorry, I never followed lobster boy. He makes me cringe. But I have an actual complaint about western socialist left that seems to care about the optics of helping women and minorities, never realising that, contrary to what feminists illogically say, that not all men are supposed to be put in stereotype boxes.
About 99% of my politics is pretty much as leftist, but if that 1% care about men’s rights to be treated equally as that of women is going to get labelled as a “Petersonian” or “pseudointellectual” redpill apologist, I welcome that with open arms. That includes comments like this post has, about a woman stereotyping all men based on what is probably her 2-5 male friends.
We are not going to keep taking shit we are not responsible for. Blame the men that need to be blamed.
You’re not, but you sound more passive-aggressive with that Reddit-tier opener. If you’re that big into “self improvement” try improving your delivery style.
I never followed lobster boy
Considering how much you’ve already either lied about or laughably misread women around you, I’m going to doubt you here. If you truly haven’t, and you want to continue your crusade of self pity and totally-not-misogyny misogyny, you’re missing out by not signing on with Dr. Professor Peterson Esquire PhD MD. You have no apparent functional differences between your ideology and his.
About 99% of my politics is pretty much as leftist
There it is again. You are so totally as leftist as they come,
The thing with bigots like you is that you think it’s some equal (or worse) negative thing to feel even a hint of what you in your privileged position dish out on a regular basis, unnoticed and unseen. If you truly feel oppressed by those evil feeeeemales, look at how many poor oppressed “canceled” men dominate corporate boardrooms and the Fortune 500 list (while burning the planet down).
is going to get labelled as a “Petersonian” or “pseudointellectual” redpill apologist
Because you are and have provided absolutely nothing of substance to prove otherwise. If you sermonize against women like a Petersonian, do pseudointellectual Redpill apologism like a pseudointellectual Redpill apologist, and then whine about the labels, the problem is not the labels. It is you.
Blame the men that need to be blamed.
You’re one of them. I am a man with good relationships with women, from my wife to my coworkers to my friends. The problem is you. Your pretenses of “self improvement” are keeping you in a bitter and hateful rut and I sincerely hope you drop the nonsense someday.
Did your “self improving” consist of listening to pseudo-evolutionary pseudo-psychologists run their mouths?
Oh no, I refuse to shut up. You are no one to be able to do that, and I effectively seize that power from you. The one who made BS redpill assumptions about me simply saying I was working on self improving my personality during college days, is you. You wrote this, right?
I think I forgot to partially address the “about women” part. There is another parent comment on this post, where a woman gets to stereotype all men based on her men friends, but that is not misandrist for some bizarre reason. My comment however was similar in tone, not aggressive, and yet it got labelled as misogynistic. If women get to speak on behalf of all men, men also get to speak on behalf of all women. Let’s play fair and equal, since feminists claim to advocate for equality.
As someone that’s done self improvement stuff (exercising, running calisthenics, healthier diet, letting stuff from the past go, mental introspection, etc) without the red pill chud nonsense, this guy’s comment is just not it. He still hasn’t let some girls “cock blocking” him go. What kind of self improvement is that? Clear issues with women here.
Uhm yes, someone that trashes others for working on themselves is a trash person, ESPECIALLY when that person claims to be a feminist. Is feminism about equality, or an illogical, incoherent bias towards favouring women no matter what?
So, what did you telling this feminist about your self improvement look like? Did it involve saying anything about the supposed nature of men and/or women?
Because you’re doing that here, and “self-improvement” has become synonymous with evo-psych quackery like Jordan Peterson’s
Simply put, I was trying to become socially a good person for friends, to become socially favourable towards girls, since I was a whacko with borderline (not fully) redpill beliefs. I did, despite what this horrible person said to me, because of “toxic masculinity” aka not giving a F about her.
Does that sound like lobster boy’s 12 rules and other evangelist Christian preaching to you?
You do not get to speak on behalf of all men either, if I do not. So, I prefer not listening if this is the message and the way you convey it. I am not functionally same as lobster boy or whoever else, and I find such arguments quite the cheapshot.
Removed by mod
Wow, that’s some deep deep misogyny
Also:
spoiler
🤏
Geez, I pointed out misandry, only for it to happen as a reply. I did not know bigotry was only one way, not both ways.
You being a crybully piece of shit and getting called out for being a crybully piece of shit isn’t misandry. You truly are not all men. Which is fortunate.
Bravo, you have solved the problem. * dusts hands *
Comparing my removed comment versus the other person’s comment on the post reveals nearly identical tendencies, which seems to be a point amusingly missed.
If my complaint about treating men equally and not shitting on all men is a misogynistic issue, I probably am not going to listen to whoever calls me that. Real misogyny is when women’s rights are attacked, NOT when men ask to be treated the same as what women preach with feminism.
Your passive-aggressive sarcasm makes you look petty and weak here. Your “self improvement” is continuing to sabotage you.
You are telling me to go become a redpiller/Tateist lol. Rather be calm and not listen, than swing myself in any direction.
Jordan Peterson once said “clean your room, bucko.” That doesn’t mean that cleaning a room is automatically a bad idea. Likewise, you must have some terrible grasp of lived reality if you think the only reason to not sulk and be passive-aggressive all the time is because of what a human trafficker might have said once.
You keep replying. You keep carrying that cross you built for yourself.
You’re freefalling in a self-inflicted rightward direction and fooling no one here.
When my politics is almost wholly leftist, both socially and politically, with my only complaint regarding men’s rights being given equal treatment as that of women (and not shitting on all men), and NOT some woman harming/suppressing that misogyny label implies, I fail to see how I can be a rightwinger. That label is used to scare men into a certain kind of leftist moral compliance, which is not the problem with me.
Did your “self improving” consist of listening to pseudo-evolutionary pseudo-psychologists run their mouths?
This is precisely why I find myself always taking a step back whenever I end up aligning with the socialist left on social politics. Everytime it is about cis het men self improvement or working out, it becomes about rightwing, redpill or whatever stereotypes you people want everyone to pigeonhole in. If that does not work, cancel, call the man a misogynist and done, hands dusted, no social consideration for men.
Sure, sure, you are as leftist as they come,
Or you pretending it’s all you’re doing when you write Elliot Rodger tier shit like this:
I can already see the Petersonian crocodile tears.
Sorry, I never followed lobster boy. He makes me cringe. But I have an actual complaint about western socialist left that seems to care about the optics of helping women and minorities, never realising that, contrary to what feminists illogically say, that not all men are supposed to be put in stereotype boxes.
About 99% of my politics is pretty much as leftist, but if that 1% care about men’s rights to be treated equally as that of women is going to get labelled as a “Petersonian” or “pseudointellectual” redpill apologist, I welcome that with open arms. That includes comments like this post has, about a woman stereotyping all men based on what is probably her 2-5 male friends.
We are not going to keep taking shit we are not responsible for. Blame the men that need to be blamed.
You’re not, but you sound more passive-aggressive with that Reddit-tier opener. If you’re that big into “self improvement” try improving your delivery style.
Considering how much you’ve already either lied about or laughably misread women around you, I’m going to doubt you here. If you truly haven’t, and you want to continue your crusade of self pity and totally-not-misogyny misogyny, you’re missing out by not signing on with Dr. Professor Peterson Esquire PhD MD. You have no apparent functional differences between your ideology and his.
There it is again. You are so totally as leftist as they come,
The thing with bigots like you is that you think it’s some equal (or worse) negative thing to feel even a hint of what you in your privileged position dish out on a regular basis, unnoticed and unseen. If you truly feel oppressed by those evil feeeeemales, look at how many poor oppressed “canceled” men dominate corporate boardrooms and the Fortune 500 list (while burning the planet down).
Because you are and have provided absolutely nothing of substance to prove otherwise. If you sermonize against women like a Petersonian, do pseudointellectual Redpill apologism like a pseudointellectual Redpill apologist, and then whine about the labels, the problem is not the labels. It is you.
You’re one of them. I am a man with good relationships with women, from my wife to my coworkers to my friends. The problem is you. Your pretenses of “self improvement” are keeping you in a bitter and hateful rut and I sincerely hope you drop the nonsense someday.
You’re the one making rightwing, redpill assertions. Shut up about women and you won’t have this problem
Oh no, I refuse to shut up. You are no one to be able to do that, and I effectively seize that power from you. The one who made BS redpill assumptions about me simply saying I was working on self improving my personality during college days, is you. You wrote this, right?
I think I forgot to partially address the “about women” part. There is another parent comment on this post, where a woman gets to stereotype all men based on her men friends, but that is not misandrist for some bizarre reason. My comment however was similar in tone, not aggressive, and yet it got labelled as misogynistic. If women get to speak on behalf of all men, men also get to speak on behalf of all women. Let’s play fair and equal, since feminists claim to advocate for equality.
“Simply saying I was working on self improving” lmao
Wtf is that comment? Actually unhinged
Can you feel the self improvement?
As someone that’s done self improvement stuff (exercising, running calisthenics, healthier diet, letting stuff from the past go, mental introspection, etc) without the red pill chud nonsense, this guy’s comment is just not it. He still hasn’t let some girls “cock blocking” him go. What kind of self improvement is that? Clear issues with women here.
“Men on the other hand are calm, which is why they calmly write whiny crybully misogynist shit like all of the above.”
Uhm yes, someone that trashes others for working on themselves is a trash person, ESPECIALLY when that person claims to be a feminist. Is feminism about equality, or an illogical, incoherent bias towards favouring women no matter what?
So, what did you telling this feminist about your self improvement look like? Did it involve saying anything about the supposed nature of men and/or women?
Because you’re doing that here, and “self-improvement” has become synonymous with evo-psych quackery like Jordan Peterson’s
Simply put, I was trying to become socially a good person for friends, to become socially favourable towards girls, since I was a whacko with borderline (not fully) redpill beliefs. I did, despite what this horrible person said to me, because of “toxic masculinity” aka not giving a F about her.
Does that sound like lobster boy’s 12 rules and other evangelist Christian preaching to you?
I am a man. I will speak on behalf of men that are not you and tell you to fuck off.
You do not get to speak on behalf of all men either, if I do not. So, I prefer not listening if this is the message and the way you convey it. I am not functionally same as lobster boy or whoever else, and I find such arguments quite the cheapshot.