• Magician [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    hmmm okay. Deliberately vague language, but not inherently passive voice.

    I see where I went wrong - ‘I received a bullet wound’ is so much more complicated than ‘He shot me’ and obscures the perpetrator’s active role in the violence.

    • KobaCumTribute [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, and one could probably fill an entire book with all the ways language can be used to obfuscate responsibility or even what actions occurred at all. Intransitive active voice verbs can sometimes mean the same thing as different passive voice verbs that are eliding the actor (example: “he suffered injuries” is the same as “he was injured” and both can leave out who actually did the action or even what the action was beyond someone getting hurt), and even including an actor can be distancing if it’s something intermediary between the one actually doing something and the victim (example: grammatically using “bullets” as the actor in explaining what injured someone, as if they simply manifested themselves without human involvement).

      Hell if one really wants to get silly with it one can even start eliding the victims as well with things like “injuries happened” or “there were bullet related injuries after the officer related altercation” which become completely empty statements.