• beigegull@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Imagine for a moment that you were running a web design business and an intolerant church group requested that you build a God Hates Gays website for them. Should Mississippi be able to have a a law that compels you to build that website or be liable for discriminating against a protected group, or should that law be unconstitutional under a compelled speech argument?

    • axel_luke@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Isn’t it illegal to reject a customer due to religious belief? This does comes back to the question of “what is speech?” Maybe it’s like porn where you know it when you see it :P

      I don’t exactly disagree with the ruling, just with the conservative backsliding the Supreme Court has been doing, I’m concerned about what this ruling might encourage in terms of growing the interpretation of speech and creative expression to provide work arounds to the civil rights act for those who wish to discriminate.

      But hey, I could be overly worried for nothing. I sure hope I am.