• CyborgMarx [any, any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      1 year ago

      What’s really hilarious is the fact elite Romans despised the primitive capitalists amongst their midst, it’s almost like Roman society was defined by landed nobles who relied on slave labor to generate accumulation for the sake of status and luxury and not capital gains through the exploitation of a working class for the sake of reinvestment in productive assets

      The debased money grubber was an archetype in Roman literature, and yet these dipshits still think Roman society was defined by capitalism lmao

    • JeffBozo [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Heh, Romans owned houses, paid wages (of course a cracker like me aren’t going to mention the slaves), and traded goods. CAPITALISM!!!

      Why is it that libs never know what capitalism is? And could this pretentious asshat be more reductive than this? All it takes to disregard Roman society as either capitalist or communist (who would even claim that it was communist lol) is to look at the class structure of the Roman society.

      And gosh, calling yourself Publius like you’re some expert on the Roman empire and then acting smug and dumb as a bag of rocks means it’s definitely a white right-winger.

    • goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nah they got around that by calling them slaves.

      Then again the soldiers didn’t exactly always get paid so really they weren’t known for paying workers