• Bruncvik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    101
    arrow-down
    25
    ·
    1 year ago

    In fairness, the meme doesn’t work all that well in Europe. The “far left” statement is defines centre-left parties here; far left is usually about enforced wealth and income sharing, even if it means imprisoning or mass killings. See Marxist collectivisation efforts, for example.

    • notacuban@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      144
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      I wrote a whole 3 paragraph reply to this, but it crashed and now I’m too lazy to write it again.

      But yes, this. “Everyone getting UBI and universal healthcare” is not far left. Far left is firebombing pharmaceutical companies or forceable seizure of private property to distribute amongst others, or enforced working arrangements to bring about equality.

      What most Americans on Lemmy call “far left”, I’d call “basic respect for your fellow man and the compassion to put others before yourself”.

        • jballs@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah the furthest left American politician that has any sort of following is Bernie Sanders. And his basic ideas are let’s tax billionaires and give people healthcare. Not exactly revolutionary stuff.

      • candybrie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        41
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Which is why it’s so crazy that people in America try the enlightened centrist thing. Our far left is center in many other countries.

        • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Can we stop with the “many other countries” thing and just say Western Europe? We all know you’re not referring to India.

          • frezik@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            For that matter, even “Western Europe” covers a lot. This argument tends to rest on the overall better social safety net policies of those countries. When it comes to gay marriage, trans rights, abortion, or even racism, many of those western European countries don’t survive the comparison looking quite so rosy.

        • bastion@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes, so a reasonable centrist comes off as a little more left than right - but the failure of the Republican party to retain it’s moral center doesn’t make the left correct or sane in its thinking.

          The key thing is getting out of party mentalities, and getting into well-reasoned positions by identifying and facing your own (personal) fears.

          Emotions scale up into collective action - you get a bunch of angry, hateful republicans who haven’t dealt with their losses of power and moral authority well, and the whole organization becomes angry and hateful.

          You get a bunch of idealistic, unrealistic thinkers who can’t help but see themselves as victims, yet can’t help but ride the Hate Train when anyone does something that dares to look like it’s something bad, or foes against current virtue signaling trends? …well, that organization also becomes avoidant, irrational, and hateful in its own way. It’s just, with all the avoidance, it doesn’t have to deny the hate - the people involved genuinely believe they’re “the his guys”.

          Deal primarily with your oen issues, and utilize whatever power you personally have for the best good you can see. That makes me centrist.

        • leftzero@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Your “far left” are centre-right conservatives by civilized standards.

      • Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        Tis the bane of my existence that people in the America’s tar socialism and communism with the same brush ignoring their own history of market socialist policy creating long periods of stability. That McCarthism is one hell of a drug and they overdosing.

      • DarthBueller@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        There are plenty of far left people on here, if violent rhetoric is a key indicator. E.g., run into more than a handful of people that clearly assume most white people are white devils that genocide people of color in their spare time and that need to die, who also use the language of social leftism when they’re not spewing hate.

        Besides the Overton Window shifting to the right in the US, another problem is defining what is “left”. Does left mean open borders, or does it mean not using migrants as political pawns? Does left mean enforcing secularism in the public sphere, or does it mean bending over backwards with tolerance toward exclusivist minority religious groups who would not return the favor if they gained power? (Does it mean I have to learn how to uptalk and entirely repress myself to the point where I don’t even know what “me” is anymore and only a select few can take me seriously?)

      • partizan@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        43
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        People who push UBI dont understand how economy and incentives work. Here in our EU country, we have universal healthcare and there is also some sort of UBI for a period of time if you were working previously, but lost your job or something. And its definitely not the saving grace people from US picturing it to be…

        The public healtcare here is in rumbles and pre-colapse, you either wait for some essential treatments up to a week or you will pay up and go to a private ambulance anyway… The treatment you get are also basically on the bare necessary level. Most hospitals are buildings from soviet era, with minimal up-keeping and modernization… Many of those workers who work in state hospitals are under payed and overworked, so many of the younger ones just get up and go somewhere abroad where they are payed better for the same job. We have the most doctors post retirement age (65) still working (probably oldest average age in the whole world), due to qualified workers shortage, as they mostly leave. And thats the not so nice real picture, of what many of you from US want to implement.

        Sure, first it will be nice and great to have free health care, but basically in every country they have it, the service quality slowly getting worse over the decades, as there is no incentive to modernize those hospitals that much, when its free after all, and you pay for it anyway, only that you pay for it with your taxes, so even the option to vote/choose with your wallet is removed from you…

        • orrk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          37
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          UBI for a period of time is not UBI, it is unemployment insurance.

          and having been in Germany/America (privileged, I know) a week? there are Americans waiting MONTHS for essential treatment, fuck Americans routinely die in the ER waiting room. or if they don’t have insurance, in front of the parking lot!

          yes, the post soviet system is genuinely better than what the Americans have right now, unless your walthy, but those people don’t have these types of issues anywhere

        • Slimy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          But what are you trying to say at the end? I dont think the US doesn’t do any better either, what could be better than both of them?

          • partizan@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            19
            ·
            1 year ago

            Not sure what system we need, but a state owned universal healthcare system is definitely not it either…

            • dragonflyteaparty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              Question though. Do you know about the budget of your country? Do you know if state healthcare consistently loses funding over time? Or does your country continue to invest in state healthcare and ensure it has everything it needs to function properly?

              • partizan@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                The healthcare budget for 2023 is 8.1 Billion Euros in our country, from that 6.8 B. are going directly on treating patients, according to our state site.

        • Lemminary@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          there is no incentive to modernize those hospitals that much, when its free after all, and you pay for it anyway

          While that may be true to some extent, our “third-world country” healthcare is great once you get through the door. We have competent doctors (some of whom I personally know) who got a great education from our public universities. We also occasionally get modern equipment like the new state-of-the-art sample processing robotics lab that’s the size of an apartment. And while one of my relatives has been waiting on an affordable CT scan for some time, it’s only because they’re literally constructing the building. The system may be limping along, but it’s honestly not that bad.

        • frezik@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          . . . wait for some essential treatments up to a week . . .

          Clearly, nobody in the US healthcare system has waited for an important appointment for several months. Nope, doesn’t happen.

          Our system sucks ass even when you can pay for it.

    • FaeDrifter@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      When I saw any self-described leftist call for that level of violence, my gut instinct was that they’re a right wing neo-Nazi type trying to make leftists look bad.

      I’m starting to really dislike the “left vs right” paradigm, because it’s so not enough to describe the variety of positions people hold, and it tends to lead into “us vs them” ways of thinking that are characteristic of fascism anyway.

      • Bruncvik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Here in Ireland, the Social Democrats. I’d throw Sinn Féin into the same category, but they are more populists than a genuine centre left party. SocDems in other countries in general tend to be the centre-left party that fits the “we want to provide for everyone’s basic needs” definition.

        • agarorn@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sinn fein for me was always way more left than center.

          I agree that social democrats or socialist democrats would fit in the definution given here. However for me in Germany our socialist democratic party went really neoliveral 20 years ago and strayed away from these goals. Now it is a fat left position.

          Example: the current chancelor does too little to help with one the basic human needs there is: housing. So at least here centre-left is not trying to reach that.

      • Bruncvik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m no political scientist, but I think you are somewhat correct there. The end goal seems to be the old phrase, “from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs.” The approach differs, though: cenrte-left is focusing on the later part of the sentence, so each according to his needs. Far-left focuses on the first part, from each according to his ability.

        In practice, this translated to “We’ll force to work your arse off, and we’ll make it illegal for you to keep any merit-based reward for your labour” in the former Eastern Bloc countries. I’m familiar with this, as I grew up in one of those countries. It was illegal to be unemployed, and if you were skilled in any way, you could bet that you’d work long hours for miserable pay, because you’ve had the “ability”.