Looks like Europe not getting away from the US anytime soon

  • Zagorath
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Guys, downvotes are not for cases where you don’t like the news being reported. They’re for when the actual quality of reporting is poor, or when the topic doesn’t belong in the Community where it’s being posted, or other such technical matters like the same news being reposted.

    I can’t see anything obviously wrong with the ABC’s reporting in this case, and this is pretty obviously “overseas news”, with an Aussie bent (it mentions Australia 7 times, and Albanese once), so it definitely belongs.

      • Zagorath
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        What a dumb take. If you downvote a post that clearly belongs in a community just because you don’t like the news, all you’re doing is preventing others from learning about it. You’re not sending an anti-Trump message.

        • teft@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          What i do with my downvotes is my own agenda. Same with your downvotes and your agenda.

          Complaining about downvotes just earns more downvotes. Trying to police other peoples harmless behavior on the internet just because you don’t like it is just going to give you a headache.

          Who says people are sending an anti trump message? Maybe they don’t like op. Maybe they don’t like the source. Maybe they always downvotes at midnight. You’ll never know because the internet is capricious and weird.

          • Zagorath
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            Oh, and if you’re downvoting because “they don’t like op”, that’s definitely not a valid use of the downvote. Use the block function.

            If you don’t like the source, you’re right, that’s valid. But given it’s the ABC we’re talking about here, I very much doubt that’s it for enough people that this post got down to -3.

          • Zagorath
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            You know that downvotes aren’t harmless, right? Your downvotes affect everyone.

            • teft@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              3 days ago

              Are the downvotes in the room with you right now?

              Pixels on a screen denoting disagreement are harmless and if you feel otherwise maybe you should go touch grass to improve your mental health.

              • Zagorath
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                3 days ago

                The point of the voting system is to decide which posts are seen by more or fewer people.

                If you downvote a perfectly good post, you’re stopping people from seeing it. You cannot try to justify that by pretending it’s harmless.

                • teft@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  That might be your reason for the voting system. That doesn’t make it everyone else’s reason.

                  A downvote doesn’t stop people from seeing a post. They just have to scroll farther. Also your definition of “a perfectly good post” might not be the same as mine or someone else’s.