• PostmodernPythia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Their parts get made. They get manufactured. Pretty sure that involves fairly substantial emissions, just not compared to what we have now.

    • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sure, everything involves emissions, but when we’re talking about a 80%-90% reduction over what we have now, you can’t just handwave that away. That’s a tiny fraction of our current position.

      And if we’re going to consider that, let’s consider the ghg emissions of laying new bike trails and railroads? Of building new buses and trains?

      Manufacturing emits GHGs for anything but it’s a small fraction of the life cycle GHGs of a vehicle, especially if the electricity used in manufacturing is also renewable.

      • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        the people designing, making, and distributing all use GHG. The robots that make them all run on GHG. The distribution networks that support them all use GHG. Even the power that goes into the charge stations are coal and oil powered.

        That’s a myth, and fossil fuel propaganda.

        Much of the entire supply chain, and most of the energy mix that powers them, are already renewable and that fraction is increasing all the time.

        For example, in California the power mix is roughly 50% renewable. In San Francisco it’s almost 100%. So if I purchase a Tesla, there’s very little fossil fuels in the post manufacturing cycle.

        The whole point of EVs is to decouple transportation with fossil fuels. As our grid gets greener, so do our vehicles.