Itās a brief mention in PIC S3. As the crew approaches the restored Enterprise-D at the Fleet Museum, La Forge makes a stray comment, to the effect of:
ā¦and obviously we canāt use the Enterprise-E
at which point, everyone turns to Worf, who insists with indignation,
That was not my fault.
Thereās a beat as everyone makes a face and gives each other a knowing look, and thenā¦ thatās it.
Itās clearly meant to be a wink and a nod from the writers: āYes, we know you want to know what happened to the E, and no, we arenāt going to tell you.ā
Even the behind-the-scenes materials are mum on the topic. The Star Trek: Picard Logs, posted on Instagram, mention both an incident at Kriilar Prime that apparently led to Worfās departure, as well as a subsequent classified mission after which the ship was taken out of service. (To me, this seems at odds with what is shown on-screen: itās obvious that Worf had something to do with the Eās demise, and itās also obvious that the story is common knowledge ā even known to Crusher, who has been āout of the loopā for 20 years. So I think neither of the Logsā stories are satisfactory explanations.)
But, as I just alluded to, there are a few things we can infer about what happened to the E.
First, thereās no way it was destroyed and no way it resulted in any loss of life. For one, La Forgeās tone is too glib for that ā thereās no way he would describe the destruction of a starship in those terms. But more importantly, thereās no way that Worf would shirk responsibility for such a thing.
Second, we know itās something unusual, memorable, and (in my opinion) decidedly unclassified. And, I would argue, it seems like itās somethingā¦ funny. Or perhaps whimsical or ironic or otherwise something that itās polite to strike a glib tone regarding.
Finally, I would suggest that, whatever it was, it happened around 2384. We get a brief sighting of the E in the battle of the end of Prodigyās first season (though itās a little unclear whether it was actually supposed to be the Enterprise or the Sovereign) so we know itās active at least until then. But it seems unlikely that any loss of a starship after the Attack on Mars in 2385 would be considered a laughable matter. Whatās more, we need the -E to be out of service early enough for the -F to have a reasonable career before being decommissioned in 2401. Assuming that a loss of a starship in the wake of the Romulan Supernova would also not be a laughing matter, that would push an -F launch date perhaps as late as 2389, which seems like an implausibly short service tenure. Retiring the -E in '84 gives some flexibility for when to launch the -F and still give it a long enough service life.
So, what do you think? What are some scenarios that could satisfy the clues weāve been given? (Iāll put a couple of my ideas in the comments!)
Removed by mod
Please remember the Daystrom Institute comment guidelines and refrain from posting shallow content.
Off-topic, but since youāre a mod: does the old /r/DaystromInstitute policy of everything happens in the same universe still apply?
And if so, can you put that in the sidebar?
Excellent question. Yes, that policy is in effect (and apparently quite relevant with todayās episode). Iāll be updating the sidebar shortly.