Itā€™s a brief mention in PIC S3. As the crew approaches the restored Enterprise-D at the Fleet Museum, La Forge makes a stray comment, to the effect of:

ā€¦and obviously we canā€™t use the Enterprise-E

at which point, everyone turns to Worf, who insists with indignation,

That was not my fault.

Thereā€™s a beat as everyone makes a face and gives each other a knowing look, and thenā€¦ thatā€™s it.

Itā€™s clearly meant to be a wink and a nod from the writers: ā€œYes, we know you want to know what happened to the E, and no, we arenā€™t going to tell you.ā€

Even the behind-the-scenes materials are mum on the topic. The Star Trek: Picard Logs, posted on Instagram, mention both an incident at Kriilar Prime that apparently led to Worfā€™s departure, as well as a subsequent classified mission after which the ship was taken out of service. (To me, this seems at odds with what is shown on-screen: itā€™s obvious that Worf had something to do with the Eā€™s demise, and itā€™s also obvious that the story is common knowledge ā€“ even known to Crusher, who has been ā€œout of the loopā€ for 20 years. So I think neither of the Logsā€™ stories are satisfactory explanations.)

But, as I just alluded to, there are a few things we can infer about what happened to the E.

First, thereā€™s no way it was destroyed and no way it resulted in any loss of life. For one, La Forgeā€™s tone is too glib for that ā€“ thereā€™s no way he would describe the destruction of a starship in those terms. But more importantly, thereā€™s no way that Worf would shirk responsibility for such a thing.

Second, we know itā€™s something unusual, memorable, and (in my opinion) decidedly unclassified. And, I would argue, it seems like itā€™s somethingā€¦ funny. Or perhaps whimsical or ironic or otherwise something that itā€™s polite to strike a glib tone regarding.

Finally, I would suggest that, whatever it was, it happened around 2384. We get a brief sighting of the E in the battle of the end of Prodigyā€™s first season (though itā€™s a little unclear whether it was actually supposed to be the Enterprise or the Sovereign) so we know itā€™s active at least until then. But it seems unlikely that any loss of a starship after the Attack on Mars in 2385 would be considered a laughable matter. Whatā€™s more, we need the -E to be out of service early enough for the -F to have a reasonable career before being decommissioned in 2401. Assuming that a loss of a starship in the wake of the Romulan Supernova would also not be a laughing matter, that would push an -F launch date perhaps as late as 2389, which seems like an implausibly short service tenure. Retiring the -E in '84 gives some flexibility for when to launch the -F and still give it a long enough service life.

So, what do you think? What are some scenarios that could satisfy the clues weā€™ve been given? (Iā€™ll put a couple of my ideas in the comments!)

  • CeruleanRuin@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    Ā·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    While responding to a distress call from a missing shuttlecraft and finding nothing where the shuttle should have been, the Enterprise-E flew too close to a spatial anomaly and it got trapped in a Sierpiński tetrix of folded fractal space, which caused the E to begin shrinking in size, along with everyone on it. Reversing out of the anomaly would have caused the warp core to lose coherence and destroy the ship, so it was abandoned before everyone on it was reduced to miniature.

    Itā€™s still intact and apparently fully functional but is now the size of a micromachine and resides in the office of the head of the Daystrom Institute, who enjoys using it to pester his subordinates.

    The missing shuttlecraft was eventually located within the anomaly, and its crew is fine, but Starfleetā€™s best scientists have been unable to restore them to normal size. Fortunately for them, the replicators on the tiny shuttle remain functional, so supplying the miniaturized crewmen with food and other vital supplies has not been a problem. The last time Worf heard from them, they were being recruited by Section 31.

  • Equals@startrek.websiteOPM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    Ā·
    1 year ago

    I propose that the Enterprise-E became somehow entangled in something it could not be removed from. I have a mental image of the ship somehow stuck in ā€œspatial quicksandā€ or maybe an infinite timeloop ā€“ some situation where Captain Worf saved the crew and the ship but then was not given the resources needed to extricate the vessel, leaving it to be abandoned in its place.

    More heroically, perhaps the Enterprise-E ā€œsaved the dayā€ by hooking itself into, say, the mainframe and physical hull of some starbase that suffering from some sort of collapse of software and/or hardware ā€“ saving the station from imminent destruction, but irrevocably welding the ship and station together. Again, perhaps Worf thought heā€™d be given support from Starfleet to eventually extricate the ship, which would explain why he would later feel justified claiming that the shipā€™s ultimate fate ā€œwas not his faultā€.

  • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    Ā·
    1 year ago

    Since thereā€™s no wrong answer, I suppose:

    • Worf downloaded a holoporn virus that irrecoverably damaged the shipā€™s computer. Without Data to interface with the ship systems and purge the virus, the ship was written off (oops, that was The Orville)

    • Worf lost/corrupted the command codes and its anti-theft system left it permanently immobilized.

    • It got stolen from the parking orbit at Risa (this is my head canon answer)

    • It got transformed by that alien archive comet from Masks

      • unix_joe@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        Ā·
        1 year ago

        Off-topic, but since youā€™re a mod: does the old /r/DaystromInstitute policy of everything happens in the same universe still apply?

        And if so, can you put that in the sidebar?

        • williams_482@startrek.websiteM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          Ā·
          1 year ago

          Excellent question. Yes, that policy is in effect (and apparently quite relevant with todayā€™s episode). Iā€™ll be updating the sidebar shortly.