• AdmiralShat@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    What’s funny to me is that the solution to long term use was in their hands. They could have licensed it cheaply to other devices until it replaced the mini USB, then charged whatever they wanted for use once it was the defacto standard. Instead they clasped too tightly onto it and now it’s being forced into retirement

    With how many cheap android phones have been produced, they’d be making money even if someone wasn’t buying an apple product, essentially taking a piece of the market share that wasn’t theirs.

    • CptMuesli@artemis.camp
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      But they did not see themselves as a utility supplier. They preferred having the superior charging cable over licensing it to others. This way they protected their market share on Iphones.

      • Baku
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t know, maybe I’m just in a minority but personally I don’t care enough about what port is on a phone that that’s my primary concern when choosing a new phone. Sure, if a similarly spec’d phone at a similar price point drops I might take it into account, but for the most part I buy the best phone I can with the budget I have

    • Whirlybird
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      They would get wrecked by anti-competitive commissions by doing that btw.