HOLY FUCKING SHIT JUST USE TRAINS OH MY FUCKING GOD train-shining

  • nightshade [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    “When you’re looking at a terminal, a traditional freight train is about three miles long, which means you need a place to park three miles of a rolling stock. You need a buffer of about 300 containers. You have trucks going back and forth. It’s a big operation with a lot of real estate and a lot of cost. Our vehicles can interface like a semi truck to go directly where they need to go, load and unload you to get out of the way,” Howard told me.

    So just… make a shorter train? You can make trains more flexible without going down to “each car has its own motor”. The only reason why freight trains are so long now is because the companies wanted to cut costs by reducing the number of drivers (even though this comes at a cost to safety and worker well-being). Of course, they need to believe in autonomous rail cars so they can fantasize about automating away their need for workers instead of just employing more people.

  • showmustgo [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    A better idea would be to shift some of that cargo to our underutilized railways—here, the idea of platooning is an old one, better known as a “train.” Parallel Systems hopes to do just that with its second-generation autonomous battery-electric freight railcar.

    No FUCKING way

    There’s literally no downside to having a huge spiderweb of autonomous vehicles each trying to perform their own unique pathfinding

    There are no conceivable consequences

    :what-the-hell: