• Baku
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I can sort of see why for some of them, if they’re realigning and completely redoing some of them then that does make sense, but I’m not really sure about the whole closing the entire station for that long part. Obligatory I don’t live in Brisbane, but I do love in Melbourne and we’ve had a lot of stations completely demolished and rebuilt in less time than that. I’m guessing there’s some tradeoff between money and time though. Easy to get stations up quickly if you pay people to work on it 24/7, including weekends but that does blow the budgets out big time

    But even still, I’m not sure an entire 10+ months of closures for a cheap price is the best tradeoff to be making, though I suppose it is better than spending double the amount on half the stations

    • WaterWaiver
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes it’s a tradeoff between time and money. Successful contractors like to split their staff thin across many jobs rather than concentrate them on a few, the risks are lower and unintended delays are more easily absorbed.

      Also it’s common for 10 months at cost ‘x’ to really become 20 months and cost ‘2x’ (especially if it was a highly competitive bidding process with multiple similar jobs available, which this might be).