Mark Rober just set up one of the most interesting self-driving tests of 2025, and he did it by imitating Looney Tunes. The former NASA engineer and current YouTube mad scientist recreated the classic gag where Wile E. Coyote paints a tunnel onto a wall to fool the Road Runner.

Only this time, the test subject wasn’t a cartoon bird… it was a self-driving Tesla Model Y.

The result? A full-speed, 40 MPH impact straight into the wall. Watch the video and tell us what you think!

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          3 days ago

          He’s had humans don’t use LiDAR so his cars shouldn’t have to. Of course humans have a brain, and he’s cars don’t, but you can’t tell him anything.

            • Bazoogle@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              I think it’s also reasonable to say a human dying because of their own actions is different than a human dying because a big corp cut costs on safety features in an entirely autonomous car where the human has no ability to stop what’s happening. (You can control them in current teslas, but they’re working on cars without human controls as well)

      • jaschen@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 days ago

        It was removed because it was giving false positives. They should have upgraded it with lidar but decided to just remove it.

        • snooggums@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Yeah, it might drive straight into a wall but at least it isn’t returning false positives!

      • nialv7@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Tesla had radar+sonar, and that wasn’t their own tech - they used mobileye EyeQ back then. When they switched to in house tech they ditched the radar and sonar which made no sense to me. But at the time I saw their lead say in an interview that this is superior and I believed. not anymore.

        they said doing so cut costs but obviously lidar/radar/sonar only gets cheaper over time, let alone the extra r&d costs because a vision only system is much more difficult to develop.

    • Valmond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      They are so expensive too! /s

      Who would have known electronics gets cheaper all the time?? /j