• sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      And screen. And buttons.

      I also want something that’s supported more than 3 years so there’s a point to repairing it. Ideally, support should come from the community so it can be infinite as long as someone is willing to do the work.

    • IHeartBadCode@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’m curious, how repairable? Like comfortable with a solder iron or slots and what not like a PC?

      Repairable phones would be great but the demand for them hasn’t undone the cost of design for them. There’s a lot of tech in an incredibly small package, so repairable phone would still require people to have specialty equipment to repair.

      Like very few people own an oven for working with BGA chips. And if we go with socket based chips, the thickness of the phone has to increase or the battery has to decrease.

      Don’t get me wrong, I think an open and repairable phone would be great. But having one is an engineering challenge that most phone makers have opted to just skip putting dollars into because the demand for one doesn’t justify the cost. Your average buyer is just chasing shiny and doesn’t see repairing their dinosaur as valuable.

      But yeah, I’m sure there’s plenty here that would love such a device. Sadly we are not the majority.

      • WrittenInRed [any]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 day ago

        Imo I don’t think the goal is/should be “every part is repairable by any average person without tools” tbh. Like that would be awesome but it also isn’t realistic, like you said phones are super complicated. But making simple repairs – stuff like swapping a battery – possible for anybody is realistic imo, and then the rest should be as easy to repair as possible for local shops or someone who does have the necessary skills and equipment. At least personally I feel like that’s a good spot to aim for.

      • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Replacing SMT components would fall outside of repairability for 99.99999% of people. More realistically things like ports, screens, and batteries should be replaceable since they’re typically connected to the main board with cables. Furthermore ICs going back on a phone is probably extremely rare while the above mentioned items are very common failure points.

      • Druid@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s sad that people have gotten used to just throwing away stuff instead of repairing it. Sure, some repairs really aren’t worth it - like the screen I’d gotten replaced of my LG G3 that was prone to have this defect with its screen regardless of screen swaps and whatnot - but most of the time, it’s just minor things that can actually be fixed by non-tech savvy person.

        I think it should be of paramount importance that more companies are held accountable as to the amount of waste they’re producing and how much they’re contributing to pollution and waste around the globe. Unfortunately, capitalism is a thing, so that’s not gonna happen.

        Having repairable options for those that do care is awesome, though. If I could afford, I’d gladly go for a Fairphone if I ever need to replace my current phone (still going strong after 5 years of use). Until their mass appeal, they’ll likely remain out of my pockets.

      • ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Bga is more about skill than equipment. I’ve done it with a cheap hot air gun and a toaster oven. Though it took many failed attempts to get right

        But this isn’t always about your phone being repairable by you. It’s about your phone being repairable at all. Apple, google, samsung, et al have made it clear that they have no interest in refurbishing and repairing phones. That’s fine, they have the right to do whatever I guess. And further, this creates a great opportunity for many people to create small businesses.

        America has very few markets left wherein one can create a business that is not utterly dominated by some conglomerate that will eat your shit. This is one where you can do so, with honest work (eg not just buying shit from Chinese manufacturers and reselling it on amazon for a profit).

        However, the tech industry is openly hostile to small business and its consumers, so every business that has worked in this sector has been either destroyed or hollowed out to barely anything by big techs greedy bullshit in the name of security.

        This would enrich communities: you would have another possible route where someone local could open a business within the community, that would hire locally within the community. But apple, samsung, microsoft, etc lobby extremely hard to make sure that they never have to stop pairing parts, providing spare parts, providing schematics, etc. and of course they’re not being asked to do this for free. They’re being asked to do this for a fair and reasonable cost, but they still refuse.

        Now designing phones with user replaceable wear items like batteries or even common failure points like screens is obviously a good idea as well in theory but comes with challenges. However the challenges are mixed. Batteries can be user replaceable in thin and waterproof phones. The galaxy s5 is almost as thin and almost as waterproof as the s23 and has a user replaceable battery. If more engineering effort was put forth I’m sure it could be greatly improved. The issue is design; they (especially apple) don’t want to disrupt their “beautiful”glass back phones that 99.9999% of people slap a case on. User replaceable screens are more challenging to make waterproof but I’m sure they could figure it out.

        But if the above was addressed, they wouldn’t necessarily have to. We could go back to the days of going to a small store next to your grocery store and getting your phone screen changed out for $150 while you do your shopping. except much more money because an iphone 16 pro max oled is ~ $700 just for the screen, which brings up the other issue of people don’t want to repair stuff anymore because component cost is outrageous. The phone is $1200 for the base model so if the screen and labor is $800 a lot of people will (foolishly) go “well for $400 more I can just get a brand new one!” even though it’s the same damn phone. However, these screen prices fall dramatically when the phones get even a few gens older and a bunch get recycled

    • OfficerBribe@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      HMD (Nokia) Skyline has a cool feature where you unscrew 1 screw and can change various things like battery. Unfortunately phone itself is not impressive especially from OS update standpoint (only 2 year support for major Android versions). I would love to see this idea being copied by other manufacturers.

      • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        Unfortunately phone itself is not impressive especially from OS update standpoint

        I swear to god manufacturers do this on purpose so that they can point to the low volume of sales and claim “See! People don’t really want these features” when in reality they’ve just slapped a couple good features onto a completely dog shit device.

    • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Whoever owns the Nokia badge are selling phones designed specifically for repairability by end users; the only issue I have with them is they don’t really say much about how long they’re going to have software support, so expect it to last 4 to 6 years tops before replacing it becomes required anyway.

  • Habarug@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Well, I can’t speak for everyone else, but I can’t go back because they don’t sell any small phones.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 day ago

      I picked the Pixel 8 because:

      1. it runs GrapheneOS
      2. It was a little smaller than the Pixel 8 Pro

      If there was a smaller version available, I would’ve gotten that instead.

      • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        I picked the Pixel A because:

        1. It runs GrapheneOS
        2. It’s slightly smaller and slightly cheaper than the normal version
        3. The back is plastic and not glass

        Glad I can use it and type on it one-handed, can’t imagine using a bigger phone.

      • rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’ve been using the “A” branch of the Pixel line for years now.

        But I use CalyxOS so I guess you and I have to be enemies now. My name is Inigo Montoya, you use a different OS, prepare to die.

      • thanksforallthefish@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        I can’t trust anything made by google. It’s a company that literally makes its money capturing everything everyone does on the internet…and yet the phone they make is the ONLY phone immune to having everything captured…

        Sorry. Not buying it. There will be a chip in there phoning home we’ll find out about in a decade.

    • otacon239@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’m clinging to my SE. It’s the last small phone made by anyone other than Chinese no-names. I will be sad when it’s no longer viable as an option.

      • nylo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        my Chinese tiny phone has a name, it’s the Unihertz Jelly Star. they even have a subreddit, not sure what makes you think it’s a “no name” they make a lot of phones for niches in today’s world including one with a physical qwerty keyboard.

        now the fact that they’re the only company filling those niches sucks, but it’s better than nobody doing it.

        • kurcatovium@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          Well, how’s it supported? This is usually what kills these phones. Even brand like Xiaomi dump their non-flagship model really soon. I have one, bought as a new model, was officially supported for like a year. Great.

          • nylo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            not sure. stacking niches means there’s a good chance the answer is no though.

            if it’s just a matter of specs it should be up to it, the hardware is pretty beefy for a phone, but I figure there’s more to it than that.

            personally I don’t have the spoons to pour in the effort required to degoogle. the fact that the algs and few ads I see are completely irrelevant to me suggest that I have thoroughly confused them by how non-standard my internet usage is. I’m not overly concerned about the data they do get or what they do with it.

            there are enough Man-Made Horrors Beyond My Comprehension™️ keeping me up at night but you do you

            • ilmagico@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 day ago

              The old jelly pro had a decent modding community, and I definitely was able to unlock the bootloader and root it, though not sure about degoogling.

      • TheRealKuni@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        There was the iPhone 13 Mini. It’s adorably small. But it didn’t sell well so they stopped making the Mini line.

        • bluesheep@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          I’ve got a 12 mini and bought it just because it was small. Had nothing else from the apple ecosystem (altho I did buy airpods with the phone cause it had no 3.5mm jack), and still bought it just because it was small. People like to point out and laugh at how tiny the phone is, but I don’t care cause at least I don’t have to carry around half a tablet everyday. Sad to hear they discontinued the mini line, even tho I wasn’t planning on buying apple again.

          • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            I’ll use my 13 mini until I literally can’t anymore. Sadly it seems like maybe Apple will release a clamshell to get back to the pocketable size but never a mini phone again. Wish the 16e used a mini chasis

    • Shdwdrgn@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      I upgraded to a Sony Xperia XZ2 compact last year. It has a 5" screen and decent capabilities, the only down side is it doesn’t support 5G. For a phone that’s over 5 years old, it’s probably the most recent usable phone available which actually fits in my pocket.

      Seriously, don’t show me a damn tablet computer and try to sell it to me as a mobile phone. If you can’t make a compact phone then you’re not really advancing the technology, are you?

      • myplacedk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        If I can’t use it one-handed (using ALL physical buttons and ALL parts of the screen), then it’s not a phone.

        Seriously, this is how we used to define the difference between phones and tables - one-hand or two-hand use.

        • Shdwdrgn@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Right? I mean I’m still lamenting the loss of slider keyboards, typing on a screen is so damn unreliable that I was forced to turn on the auto-correction, which itself is highly unreliable and constantly changing real words while failing to fix the words where I hit a number instead of a letter (the word “9f” gets typed a LOT!). I use my phone for phone calls and sending texts, with a secondary usage as a GPS in my truck. If it can’t perform one of three basic tasks then what good is it?

    • Xanthrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      They do, but service providers don’t like selling them. There isn’t as much of a return on smaller/ dumb/ cheap phones. I used to work at spectrum, and we’d speak of the cheap phones in hushed tones like they were the boogeyman. It felt horrible because I was using my cheap android while selling people iPhone 15s.

      • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        So once again instead of providing choice the market is simply phasing out things with smaller profit margins as if they planned it together in some kind of cartel.

        • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          Demand also isn’t there. The iPhone SE sold ok, but the other thing to keep in mind was that it was the cheap iPhone too so it’s supposed to sell.

          If it was outselling the main model every year then they’d keep making them small. But they didn’t so they got dropped.

          • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            If it was outselling the main model every year then they’d keep making them small.

            Why would they do that if they make more money on the main model? It’s not like you have a choice in iOS manufacturers.

        • corbin@infosec.pubOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Not really, even the cheap phones have large screens now. There’s no correlation anymore between price and screen size, the cheap phones just have lower quality panels.

  • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    I don’t understand why so many people here keep saying that it’s too hard to make a small phone when all these companies literally make watches with 5G connections…

    • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 day ago

      They always lean a little too hard into making the small one the “budget” phone and end up gimping it into something nobody wants, and yet they still don’t make it cost attractive.

      Compared to the SomePhone Pro, the SomePhone Mini has:

      • 6GB of RAM rather than 8. (I mean, okay, what do I need that much RAM for?)
      • 128GB onboard storage rather than 512GB (Those chips are the same footprint so that wasn’t done for miniaturization, but I don’t store a lot on my phone so ok)
      • No SD card slot. (I suppose you could argue that IS for miniaturization but it’s still a kick in the pants)
      • 1080p display rather than 4k. (fine, the PPI is still finer than my eyes)
      • 3100mAh battery instead of 3600 (You know the reduced resolution on the display will probably make up for that anyway)
      • No NFC (really?)
      • No fast charging (fucking sigh)
      • No wireless charging (pegwarmer says what?)
      • 5.9 inch 9:21 display (so it’s 89% the size of the Pro model anyway?)
      • a laptop grade VGA camera (you’re actively trying to make this product fail, aren’t you?)
      • Locked bootloader, locked carrier (because of course)
      • $899 instead of $949 MSRP (Okay just stop saying words and drown yourself in the septic tank)
      • AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        This is exactly the problem. I don’t need a budget phone, I need a small phone

      • PlantJam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        The latest pixel pro is available in both the regular size and the XL. In previous models the pro was only available as the XL.

    • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      i don’t think it’s “too hard” to make small phones. but i bet it’s easier to sell bigger phones with more profit margin.

    • potustheplant@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Who said that? That’s not the limiting factor. Also, smartwatches have crappy processors.

      Supposedly, what’s hard is making a phone with good performance and battery life that’s also small.

  • Fair Fairy@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I don’t want a small phone or a slide out keyboards.

    I want :
    Replaceable battery.
    Non glass back.
    3.5 jack.

  • Imhotep@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    people spend a third of their lives on those things. And while cumbersome, a big screen simply is better for media consumption

    only way I see smaller phones make a comeback is if we change our habits or if a new technology comes along

    • Madis@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      new technology comes along

      I believe the RAZR foldables allow you to do almost anything on the front screen, and in the latest iterations the front screen is larger than Samsung’s.

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 @pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Why can’t we have both? I want a bigger phone. Bigger than what I have now, and many people would consider this to be a fairly large phone.

    But I don’t want to stop people who want smaller phones from having those, too.

    • cm0002@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 day ago

      Right? Everybody has different size hands, my hands are on the larger side and these bigger phones of today are actually pretty comfortable to me

      • u/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        I have fairly small hands, but still prefer a larger phone. More content on the screen and space for battery.

        HOWEVER, I’d take both. A small phone would be a good secondary device. I want something modern the size of my Samsung Galaxy Ace (GT-S5830i). The back also has a really nice texture.
        Oh, yeah, it also has a headphone jack, MicroSD card slot and quickly swappable battery which I should probably replace because it seems it has slightly increased its capacity… volumetric capacity.

        But I also prefer a bit more thickness so it doesn’t feel like a fragile, slippery sheet of glass (rugged phones are good for that).

      • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        I am a very average-sized woman with average-sized hands, and big phones would have been unusable for me. Seems like they’re all for big men’s palms.

      • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        They’re saying the smartphone market is too homogenous and there should be more options so that people actually have a choice in the device they buy.

      • Zorque@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yeah, but most cries (including this article) aren’t “We want both” but “We want small instead”. The article goes out of its way to ridicule “huge” phones.

        The battle cry seems to be demanding it their way instead of variety.

    • CoolMatt@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Yep, got big hands myself and own an S21+, and the keys on the keyboard are still too fucking small. Sick of correcting nytypos after 10 years, so finally not giving a fuck.

      Ironically, i typed this entire comment without a typo, gotta love how that works.

      Edit: oh wit, found onr. Guess y’all just gotta deal with ut.

      • rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        If you’re not using Swype or whatever it’s called on gboard give it a shot. I have dumb fingers and I can text in my work gloves.

        • CoolMatt@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Oh yeah buddy, been using swiftkey for idk 6 years but I’m not in the habit of using it most of the time because half the words I swipe come out the wrong word 😄

          • rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            It has to learn from your “style”. I’m using… something, can’t be bothered to check, but because I don’t let it phone home I’ve had to adjust my “style” to it’s default behavior. Wasn’t too bad learning it.

  • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 day ago

    People don’t buy them for the price they’ll buy bigger phones. That’s it. That’s the whole story.

    They have to make the phone cost $300 less to sell in meaningful numbers. Why do that when they could just not make them at all and sell fewer models at higher prices?

    • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      exactly, profit margin. people aren’t upgrading every year like they used to, so they have to make up (some of) that lost profit by increasing prices.

  • FinishingDutch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    Consumers just aren’t that interested in a product that’s visibly cheaper and worse than what everyone else is carrying. And that is what a smaller phone signals.

    Phones are a status purchase; they all do basically the same things, but most people gravitate towards higher end phones because they offer all the fancy features. Flagship phones are all large, so that’s what you see in the marketing. Just like you’ll never see a car company put its cheapest base model on a car catalog cover.

    A smaller phone tends to cut corners; it’s not just smaller, but also functionally worse. While the price might be appealing, the potential customer also knows that using said phone will mean a worse experience, and might even get them ridiculed because they got ‘the cheap one’.

    So we can absolutely go back to small phones - we just don’t want to. Smaller, cheaper, worse products just don’t appeal to a status-conscious buyer. If phone manufacturers offered the same specs at different sizes, that might change. But any savvy tech buyer knows a smaller phone is worse than the bigger one.

    Back in the pre-smartphone days, size was a thing companies could compete on since customers wanted small, light, distinctive designs in premium materials. Like the Motorola Razr V3. These days, that just doesn’t work.

    • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      At least on the iPhone side the 12 and 13 mini were full flagships in a smaller form factor. I just wish we could go back to that

      • coolmojo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        There is always the iPhone SE 3 with 4.7 inch display or the iPhone 16e with 6.1 inch display.

        • Squizzy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I had never heard of the 16e and checked their site, it will only allow comparison up to the 11, a phon from 2019. And its expensive.

          • coolmojo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Yes. The 16e released only 2 days ago and it is an entry level version of the iPhone 16. And you are right, it is not that cheaper then the full-size version.

    • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I see what you mean

      I will say, when a company tries sometimes they can make small work really well:

      There are opportunities to make small desirable. But I know people like their big trucks, I’m sure people like their big phones too.

  • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Here’s what I want, roughly in order of priority:

    1. long term OS support
    2. repairable
    3. privacy friendly
    4. small

    I currently have a Pixel 8:

    1. 7 years software support, maybe more
    2. 6/10 on ifixit score; not great, but better than many
    3. supports GrapheneOS
    4. on the smaller end of “normal” today

    A community-supported Linux phone would be awesome, since I’d get 1 and 3 by default and 2 by convention, but they don’t meet my minimum needs from a phone: reliable basic feature support. Hopefully we get there by the time my Pixel dies.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        My main complaint is that they don’t directly support the US. There’s a reseller here, but I think there are issues with some bands.

        Maybe it’ll be better the next time I need a phone.

        • ArchRecord@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Plus they don’t support GrapheneOS. (or rather, GrapheneOS doesn’t support them due to it being too expensive to support more than one model while also not having the same hardware integrity measures that Pixels have) It’s the only thing stopping me from getting them for my next phone, because while I don’t necessarily need the fastest processor, highest resolution screen, etc, I do need a phone that won’t break over time until it becomes useless in a few years.

      • Habarug@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        The Fairphone is interesting, but it is also enormous unfortunately

  • nylo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    there is one option.

    well and a couple others that are also made by Unihertz depending on your needs/wants

    more companies making them would be cool but the general consensus I’m reading here is that there are 0 and that is incorrect.

    • ilmagico@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      I have their old Jelly Pro, awesome tiny phone, replaceable battery, fits easily into any pocket, was my daily driver for a few months, but then again, it’s just a bit … too tiny. Also, battery life sucked, camera quality forget it, speaker not loud enough, low res screen, etc. I’d be curious if they improved on these things with this new version.

      Still, one thing is still missing from the specs is 5G support. I mean, 4G is plenty fast, but not very future proof, carriers are starting to shift more towards 5G, 3G is already being phased out, and it’s just a matter of time before 4G follows.

      • nylo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        yeah the screen is very small but that’s kinda the point for my use case. I didn’t want all the limitations of a dumbphone (i.e. I wanted banking apps, gps, useful browser) but I wanted to add friction to my phone use to encourage me to use it less.

        battery life is great, lasts me almost 2 days without a charge and will typically go from almost dead to almost full if I plug it in while driving to work. part of the battery life being so good is that I use it less and keep it in grayscale 99% of the time I figure though.

        camera is great, it’s 48MP the same as an iPhone 14 Pro. the pictures don’t look great on the device because of the tiny screen but when I look at them on my computer or the pixel 6 I still use at home they look great.

        speaker is pretty awful, it’s fine for calls but music, fuhgeddaboudit! I have a Bluetooth clip on speaker that’s great and I don’t really watch videos on it so non-issue, for me at least.

        screen res hasn’t bothered me but again that might just be use-case. most of what I do is reading text and it’s fine for that esp with high contrast on, looks ugly but again that’s friction and I want that.

        • ilmagico@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yeah, sounds like they improved quite a bit, I might consider it, thanks! Still, lack of 5G means not so future proof

  • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    This author should’ve spent digging into the iPhone 12 / 13 mini, and how it was received in Apple communities a few years ago.

    That experiment really showed that the small phone demographic is passionate and vocal, but small (no pun intended). Those phones sold well when the small-phone-fans ran out to buy them, but the sales numbers cooled off quick.

    Given that Apple is working on a lightweight 17 “air” phone, my guess is that they learned screen size is too important for too many people, but they’re going to see if they can strike a middle ground with weight / pocket fit.

    • Habarug@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      The 12 mini had really poor battery life. I have the normal 12 myself, and even that one has underwhelming battery life, but the mini was way worse. Don’t know about 13, but I would hope that recent advances in chip efficiency and battery technology would allow for making small phones with good battery life. Just please make it a little chonkier if you have to.

      • Darren@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I had my 13 mini for two years, and in that time I never once felt like the battery was on the way out. At worst it would be around 20% when I went to bed.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    Because most people don’t buy them?

    It’s like asking “Man, why don’t they make slider phones anymore?” (and I loved my slider phone).

      • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        obviously they did exist. why do you think phone manufacturers would stop making them if they were as profitable as the other sizes?

      • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Would you pay $1000 for one? Economy of scales matters…

        Plus everyone who did look at them would say it is smaller it should cost less! Even though a smaller phone would be more technically challenging to build. Next you have compromises. No matter what you take out to make it work. People would bitch, I need that! I don’t need this other thing! Next battery life, people complain about current battery life, you think they want less?

        I could go on, but I can easily see why manufacturers don’t want to deal…

      • nylo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’m probably gonna annoy people with this but I will shout it from the rooftops

        Unihertz makes one.

    • Lad@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      That’s right. The market has spoken, and unfortunately it has said it doesn’t want small phones. Personally, I still do though.

      • Dr. Bob@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        I don’t think it’s the consumer market. It’s more expensive to manufacture with physical controls, keyboards, and moving parts. It wasn’t lack of consumer demand that killed the phono jack.

    • ilmagico@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      As a lover of small phones, unfortunately that’s the truth. Apple tried a couple years ago with their iPhone mini and sold very few. Still, there should be enough of us that maybe some smaller phone manufacturers could fill this niche.

      And maybr make it fully unlocked and repairable, replaceable battery, etc. while they’re at it.

  • twinnie@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    I don’t want a small phone, I just want a normal phone that I can use in one of my normal sized hands. I have an iPhone 13 Mini right now and it’s pretty ideal but I know they’ll go end of life one day and there’s nothing to replace it right now.