The Department of Government Efficiency run by Elon Musk last week published an initial list of 1,125 contracts that it terminated in recent weeks across the federal government. Data published on DOGE’s “Wall of Receipts” shows that more than one-third of the contract cancellations, 417 in all, are expected to yield no savings.

That’s usually because the total value of the contracts has already been fully obligated, which means the government has a legal requirement to spend the funds for the goods or services it purchased and in many cases has already done so.

That’s usually because the total value of the contracts has already been fully obligated, which means the government has a legal requirement to spend the funds for the goods or services it purchased and in many cases has already done so.

“It’s like confiscating used ammunition after it’s been shot when there’s nothing left in it. It doesn’t accomplish any policy objective,” said Charles Tiefer, a retired University of Baltimore law professor and expert on government contracting law. “Their terminating so many contracts pointlessly obviously doesn’t accomplish anything for saving money.”

  • NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    fuck ap too. find someone to talk to who will address what these chucklefuck fascists are doing, rather than their 100% bullshit explanations for what they’re doing

    Well some circles call this kind of non-biased reporting journalism.

    • snooggums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Avoiding a direct statement of fact that contradicts known liars to appear non-biased is shitty journalism.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      This shit is not “non-biased!” By taking Musk’s claimed intent at face value even though the AP knows Project 2025 is a thing, they are blatantly spinning the coverage in the regime’s favor.

      What would actually be non-biased would be to accurately report what’s actually happening, not to uncritically accept and repeat bald-faced lies!