Also offensive: pointing out that English speakers do not use the word “American” to refer to people from Latin America. The term in our language is universally used to refer to people from the country America.

  • I typically just say “American” too but I don’t do all this when I get corrected. It comes across like you’re trying to justify being racist ethnocentric.

    It is weird to hear someone say “country of America” though when you could just say “the US(A)”

    Edit: corrected language

    • 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      So you’re caving to people who are trying to force their sociolinguistic ideas on the speakers of a different language?

      It’s not you that’s being racist/ethnocentric/xenophobic/imperialist… If you were conversing in Spanish then sure, it’d be Estadounidense/Estados Unidos but in English it’s American/America and to try and force either one to change would be cultural imperialism

    • ZagorathOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I do not appreciate the accusation of racism. If that’s the kind of tenor this conversation is going to take, I’m not going to engage further.

      This is commentary on a thread that was specifically created to get into the nuances of language surrounding America. So yeah, of course I went into a lot of detail about the origins and why we say what we do.

      • I said that’s how it comes across. I’ve said things in the past that came across as racist/xenophobic/ethnocentric, and I appreciate it when people point it out so I can adjust.

        This just seems like one of those thing where if explaining and defending your position sounds racist/xenophobic/ethnocentric, you should consider changing your position or taking it less seriously

        If you’re unwilling to consider that- yeah, it might be best not to engage further

        • ZagorathOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Which part of what I said do you think is racist? Because I simply don’t see it. If anything, the ones being intolerant here are the ones who insist that the way they use words in their language is right and we have to all contort the definitions we’ve used for over a hundred years to match the etymological translation of words they use.

          • Seems to me you’re the one policing others’ language, ultimately suggesting Latin Americans aren’t Americans.

            For “Americans” to refer to only “US Americans” (and make sense), the term necessarily must exclude Latin Americans

            Note: Another user pointed out, I should’ve said ethnocentric rather than racist

            • Deceptichum@quokk.au
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              How on Earth do you think this suggests that?

              The term excludes anyone not from the country of America. The term for people from the continent is either North American or South American.

            • ZagorathOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              4 hours ago

              If they want to use it, I’m not going to correct them. If they try to “correct” me for using my language in its most widely accepted manner, that’s when I start getting mad. The only one policing others’ language arethose insisting you cannot call Americans Americans.

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            4 hours ago

            I’m intolerant of colonial language. The way “American” is used by English speakers to mean “USAmerican” is actually just US chauvinism. They think they are the center of the world and so of course American only refers to them, even though there’s a bunch of other countries in the Americas and the majority of Americans don’t actually live in the US.

            • ZagorathOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              The term “American” is colonial regardless of what you apply to it. There is no acknowledgment of the native peoples of the land today called the Americas, regardless of whether you call them all Americans or only those from the country America.

              When faced with multiple different colonial options, I’m going to stick with the one that is short, easy to say, and most widely understood.

              • slackassassin@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                3 hours ago

                It’s really funny. Do they think people speak Spanish in the Americas for some reason OTHER than colonialism. Not to mention Vespucci himself not exactly being native. It’s wild out here.

        • slackassassin@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          Are you being xenophobic when you use the term American? Or is it just common parlance? What is it when you tell people how to address themselves?

          • *ethnocentric is a better term actually, after more thinking

            Yeah, when I use the term “American” to refer to US Americans, I’m being ethnocentric. If I were to be corrected and then -instead of accepting the correction- double down and argue, that would certainly seem like I had a problem with being an equal to Latin Americans

            • ZagorathOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 hours ago

              I don’t believe ethnocentric is the correct term (I mean, clearly. I don’t believe there’s anything wrong with it. But if there has to be a label you can apply, ethnocentric isn’t it.). American is not an ethnicity. Asian Americans and African Americans are every bit as American as white Americans and Latino Americans. The only ethnicity with a better claim than all those others are Native Americans.

            • slackassassin@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              4 hours ago

              There is space for America to refer to the continents of North and South America, and also be short hand for the United States of America the same way that the United Mexican States is called Mexico.

              Inferring that it makes anyone less equal is ethnocetric, if anything.