Will Bunch expresses what I’ve been thinking since Trump was elected. American democracy is under attack from within. The fascists who yearn for an authoritarian government in the media are promoting it, and the media who supposedly don’t support it fail to recognize it. They are busy trying to follow the political playbook of the 20th century.

  • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Look Nazis are bad, but if you do anything about it, even if it’s to protect yourself or some one else! Then you’re the bad guy!”

    I really hope you’re just naive and not a concern troll.

    • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      even if it’s to protect yourself or some one else!

      That bit, right there, is what totally changes the scenario from the person you were replying to. Presuming by “protect” you mean protecting from physical violence, and not only from words.

      • whofearsthenight@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Wait until you see the manifestos from all of the shooters. Punch nazis. The nazi to violence pipeline is not theoretical.

        • Hello Hotel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I will kill your family! I know where you live, 123 example Street, right?

          Words can be violence for sure. If i were to replace this comment with just the block-quote and “/s”, moderators would justifiably light my ass up. People should not be expected to figure out if I was joking after threating their lives.

        • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          So, when you are talking about using violence “to protect yourself or some one else”, you mean protecting them from someone saying something you oppose, and we’re back to arguing that if you don’t like what someone is saying you should be allowed to assault them, because speech has consequences.

          • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Recruiting people to suppress the rights of others and sending thinly veiled threats to minorities is a form of violence bra

    • thecrotch@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      So I’m free to declare you a Nazi and assault you, right? After all, nazis are bad, and I’m just protecting myself from what I perceived as your ideology

      • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        You do know when Richard Spencer got the punch he was literally in the middle of giving a speech on how being Alt-Right is “Totally cool bro” and explaining how the character he stole from someone else’s comic book is “More than a cartoon frog, but a symbol of how many people we need to gas to death to bring Hitler back”

      • negativeyoda@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Totally. Just say “so much for the tolerant left” or “antifa are the real Nazis”

        No one has ever done that before

        Real talk: what are you “protecting yourself” from? How hast thou been persecuted? Trans people are people? You can’t tell racist jokes anymore without people thinking you’re an asshole? Come down off the cross, holmes

        • thecrotch@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Nazis. I’m protecting myself from nazis. And you just described why I, some random asshole you don’t know, shouldn’t be allowed to declare someone a Nazi and assault them. This is why we have a legal system instead of mob rule.

      • Hello Hotel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        People are probably better at explaining this than I, but I personally would only be violently-defensive is when its clear (mabe even easy for an random person off the street to agree that) an intimidation or harassment campagn, power grab or other violent attacks on basic liberties is happening.

        • thecrotch@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The problem is everyone has a different metric for that, and not everyone’s metric is a good one. The Jan 6 people thought they justified too. They were wrong and so is the person I was replying to. This is why we have a legal system. We all agreed on a metric, we all agreed that the state should have a monopoly on violence when that metric is met.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      I never said any of the such and you either know it and are lying or you’re too dumb to understand.

      If a neo nazi, or just anyone attacks you and you punch him, it’s self defense.

      If you walk up to a neo Nazi and punch him for no reason whatsoever beyond “I don’t like his opinions” then you’ll get arrested and you’ll be convicted of assault and battery. It. Is. That. Simple.

      You can armchair hero all you want about how big bad you would punch those evil Nazis but that is all bullshit and you know it. I’ve had too many discussions now with too many people like you who are so brave on the internet but in front of an actual neo nazi your piss your pants.

      Yes, ooh, Nazis are bad, I had no idea. However, we live in a civil society where EVERYONE has rights, even those with thoughts and opinions that we don’t like, even neo Nazis. If you don’t like that then guess what? That means you have racist opinions and you’re the same as what you hate so badly.

      So grow up, stip bragging on the internet how brave you are and get with the real world where you can’t just punch a person.

      • Applesauce@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Let me get this straight…you think that if someone is intolerant of racists, that makes them racist?

        • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          No, and you didn’t read anything I wrote because I literally didn’t say any of that, not sure why you’re making stuff up.

          I say that if you ASSAULT somebody because of their admittedly shitty opinions, that you’re the bad guy and are going to jail.

          That and that I’m getting slightly tired of all those armchair internet heroes in mamas basement getting hard peepees over fantasizing how they would beat up Nazis. Never mind most of them would piss their pants when standing next to an actual Dangerous person.

          • Applesauce@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Can you elaborate more then, on this quote of yours?

            ‘we live in a civil society where EVERYONE has rights, even those with thoughts and opinions that we don’t like, even neo Nazis. If you don’t like that then guess what? That means you have racist opinions and you’re the same as what you hate so badly.’

            • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Elaborate where? It’s pretty clear: everyone has rights, limitations and obligations. You do not have the right to assault people for having opinions that you (nor me) don’t like. Yes, neo-nazis are dickless assholes, yaddah, you still don’t have the right to assault them.

              It’s not that complicated

                • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I don’t really understand what is so hard to understand. Yes, racism is bad, racists are bad, neo-nazis are bad, all correct.

                  It’s also all irrelevant

                  The moment you punch somebody in the face it’s over, you are the bad one. You committed assault and battery and if the victim (yes, now you turned a Nazi into a victim, great going!) decides to press charges, depending on the injuries you caused, you might be the one ending up in jail.

                  If you tell a judge “but it’s okay to punch neo-Nazis!” The judge might just be annoyed enough to slap a few extra months on your sentence so that you’ll learn that it is not okay to assault anyone for their shitty opinions, period.

                  If somebody is threatening a group of people with a gun and you punch him to next Friday, that is a different thing and has nothing to do with that person being a neo-nazi or not, but nobody talks about that here. Everyone here says it’s okay to punch Nazi’s (Nazi’s don’t even exist, it’s neo Nazis) and they’re all wrong. It doesn’t matter if it’s Europe or the US or Canada or hell, even Mexico.

                  You punch, you wrong.

                  What is so hard to understand about that? Why do these armchair heroes (who, again, would piss their pants standing next to actual neo Nazis) keep fantasizing about assaulting people and then get an applause for that from police and judges?

                  Are you all 15 or something? What is it that I’m missing?

      • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You do know that “Send the jews back to camp! Race war now!” is not an opinion I, or ANYONE ELSE, should have to respect right?

        • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          No one is saying you have to respect the racist idiot. Just that it’s not self defense to attack someone for saying it, it’s assault. BIG difference.

        • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Did I say you have to agree with racists? Did I say anywhere that you should have respect for neo Nazis?

          I said: STOP FANTASIZING ABOUT ASSAULTING PEOPLE FOR THEIR SHITTY OPINIONS! First off you’d piss your pants in the real world, second you’d get your ass handed if you did and if you didn’t, you’d go to jail for assault and yes: YOU WOULD BE THE BAD GUY, NOT THE NEO NAZI