• Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 day ago

      Have link shorteners ever not been shitty? It obfuscates a link for the sake of making things look pretty for people who can’t format text

      • skribe
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        IIRC, they originally became popular because they saved characters for microblogs like Twitter. They’ve outlasted their usefulness though.

        • pirat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          17 hours ago

          I think some used them to gain insight in clicks (bit.ly provided stats for numbers, user agents etc.), and to track the origin of clicks by generating a unique shortened URL for each linking post.

          Also, the obvious use case of turning a long direct URL to a file into something people can actually be bothered to manually copy from paper…

      • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 day ago

        Service-specific link shorteners are alright, like youtu.be, a.co and goo.gl/maps. At least know roughly where you’re going.

        For anything else, I rather see the full URLs, and if I need to share a link on a paper medium, I also make it available in a QRcode form.

      • Scott@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Link shorteners have absolutely been useful when you need to go to a long URL on a entirely different device you can’t copy a link to easily.

        I’ve used them to make it easy to get to scripts.

          • asap@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Shortening the URL makes it possible to have significantly lower resolution QR codes, which is almost always more useful. Able to be rendered on more mediums, able to be read with lower quality readers.

      • Cousin Mose@lemmy.hogru.ch
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        When it comes to email I just have my server reject any containing links that point to URL shorteners. I’m not stupid enough to click them anyway but it’s safe to assume you’re just a scammer or some other lowlife, even if you’re otherwise considered a reputable business.

  • azron@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    Shocking. That’s what we get for expecting companies to be benevolent stewards of the internet. They tricked us for a decade and a half but the sheep’s clothing are coming off.

  • rossome!@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    Host your own URL shortener with Yourls. It’s great, loads of useful plugins too. (dot)ink domains are cheap so you can have fun with namel.ink like I did.

    • XNX@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      Or just don’t shorten links? Shortening them just makes linkrot much more likely and also obfuscates where theyre going

      • Nursery2787@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Their original purpose was when twitter had limits on how many characters you could use no?