• apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Yes this makes me sad. What makes me mad is that Biden and the Democrats waited until he’s GTFOing to bring it up politically.

  • Saleh@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Seriously people, stop falling for this statistical misrepresentation/misinformation nonsense. If the interest in a term peaked, does not mean that any significant number of people looked it up. I have compared the term with NBA and Cats to get two generic comparisions:

    The percentages in the lower part show how often the term was looked up relatively speaking. So NBA was usually looked for 30-40 times as much and cats was looked for 15-20 times as much.

    So compared to all searches, we are talking about maybe something in the range of one in a few hundred thousands to maybe on in a few thousand searches.

    • Pika@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      I’m not sure what’s being misrepresented, it’s obvious that its in comparison to itself and nothing else

      • Saleh@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        It is represented as as relevant event. But if normally 5 people google it on an average day and then 50 people googled it, it is still completely irrelevant.

        By not providing how many people in total have looked up the term, this information is meaningless, but people upvote it because they want to believe that is is a relevant amount of people who looked it up, because it makes them feel right or whatever.

        You also find this in the comments in this thread where people argue whether “oligarchy” is a term that is generally known or requires higher education.

        We also saw some “news articles” based on just looking at how the relative change of a terms searches was, suggesting this is in any way meaningful despite the reasons it is not without further context.

    • asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      So basically “peak == relative to the history of that specific term”? That seems obvious to me and not sure how someone could interpret it differently. Nothing I seem implies that number of searches for “oligarchy” is higher than any other searches for other words.

  • formergijoe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Whenever these hot trends show up, you’re only seeing when it hits peak popularity. You need a comparison to see how it is permeating society. Unsurprisingly, it appears very few people are searching for this compared to the general population.

  • taiyang@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Don’t be too Lemmy bubbled, we talk alot about it here for us to know it but I think it’s an advanced enough word for people with only a high school education not to know.

    I’m more impressed that people in the South tuned into the speech.

      • taiyang@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I wanted to see if you’re referring a vocabulary list or just being a snob so I looked it up. If you go by grade, that word generally isn’t covered until a student gets a social studies class, usually in high school.

        That’s not to mention any adult English learners out there where this wouldn’t exactly be a priority word.

  • Cris@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Its really obnoxious that Google doesn’t provide any units at all for the vertical axis

    I think someone said they used to

    • Baguette@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      They provide one on the left (0, 25, 50, 75, 100)

      What those units mean I have no clue, but I’m guessing 100 means 100% and is the highest amount of views, which they then base the rest on (5% of the highest recorded views, etc)