Irelephant@lemm.ee to 196@lemmy.worldEnglish · 22 hours agorulelemm.eeimagemessage-square29fedilinkarrow-up1328arrow-down111
arrow-up1317arrow-down1imagerulelemm.eeIrelephant@lemm.ee to 196@lemmy.worldEnglish · 22 hours agomessage-square29fedilink
minus-squareformergijoe@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up42·17 hours agoWhenever these hot trends show up, you’re only seeing when it hits peak popularity. You need a comparison to see how it is permeating society. Unsurprisingly, it appears very few people are searching for this compared to the general population.
minus-squareGreenKnight23@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up17arrow-down4·15 hours agothis is worse. you understand how this is even worse…right?
minus-squareSaleh@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up5·10 hours agoSo it is bad if people do google oligarchy and it is worse if they dont? This is a binary criterion. If both possibilities are bad, then good or bad is not correlated with this criterion.
minus-squarelazyViking@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up9·12 hours agoPeople knowing what oligarchy is, so few people have to Google it, is worse? Why?
Whenever these hot trends show up, you’re only seeing when it hits peak popularity. You need a comparison to see how it is permeating society. Unsurprisingly, it appears very few people are searching for this compared to the general population.
this is worse. you understand how this is even worse…right?
So it is bad if people do google oligarchy and it is worse if they dont?
This is a binary criterion. If both possibilities are bad, then good or bad is not correlated with this criterion.
People knowing what oligarchy is, so few people have to Google it, is worse? Why?
deleted by creator