Yeah, I think massive chemical batteries for storing excess electricity to facilitate a contrived green energy market is a bad idea.

  • scratchee@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    We can all agree on that, Clearly li-ion is a bad choice for static use cases.

    But right now it’s the cheapest option, and it looks likely that will stay true for quite a while unfortunately.

      • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        LIthium Iron Phosphate is cheapest relatively dense battery type. Sodium ion will be if lithium get expensive.

      • scratchee@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Weirdly it’s not, except maybe gravity batteries where nice reservoirs happen to exist already. It should be but it’s not right now.

        Li-ion has economy of scale right now. I do think molten metal etc will overtake eventually, but they’re currently playing catchup and li-ion has dropped in price so much over time that it’s surprisingly cheap even where it should make no sense.

          • scratchee@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Dams are a normally a power supply rather than a battery. I was more thinking pumped storage hydro. Which is usually done where theres 2 lakes next to each other at very different heights, so you can “store” power by pumping water up and release by pumping back down.