Twenty-nine percent of non-voters who supported Biden in 2020 said U.S. support for the genocide was the top reason they sat the 2024 election, according to a survey by YouGov.

  • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Choosing not to vote was the worst option to choose both objectively, and morally.

    Strictly speaking, assuming Democrats care about winning elections, it is not true.

    Sure, you get the worst option for one or two terms, but you would hopefully force the Democratic party to reform and stop supporting Genocides in the long term.

    This is why I hate when people try to shift the blame on voters. This was 100% the Democrats election to loose, and they did.

    You can’t really change the voters, so what is the point of complaining about them? You can change the party to allow it to win the next time. Blaming the voters is just distracting from that.

    • Grail (capitalised)
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Sure, you get the worst option for one or two terms, but you would hopefully force the Democratic party to reform and stop supporting Genocides in the long term.

      I’m not entirely convinced that the USA still has terms.

      • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        If ye mean it as a meme, then yes, haha.

        If you are actually worried, then don’t be. However much capitalists may suck, they won’t allow a dictator who could confiscate their wealth to take over. It’s against their own self-interest. And they have enough influence over media, politicians and probably some assassins to remove Trump if needed. That’s why communist democracies turn authoritarian pretty much on day one, while the very capitalistic ones tend to survive.

        If Trump was actually smart and competent, maybe there would be a risk, but as is, I am not worried.

        • Grail (capitalised)
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          On the other hand, I bet they would love to have a dictator THEY can control. Trump is very easy to manipulate. It’s much cheaper to give Trump a bribe than to spend billions influencing the voters. Take Elon Musk, for example. He spent 44 billion dollars to control Twitter, and it didn’t even work right. The platform is dying. 44 billion to control the internet’s agora, and then he broke it with his incompetence. On the other hand, 277 million to buy Trump is a fantastic investment.

          • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 hours ago

            And it is infinitely safer to pay off the next president as well, then to remove the safeguards that protect them from government power.

            No, if anything, I expect them using Trump to rig the next election even more, so they can control future puppet presidents even better. Not in obvious ways like ballot stuffing. But campaign donations, access to information, etc. And rotate the puppets out before they can get too powerful and dangerous.