Would it make sense for “rhyme” to rhyme with “time”?

Or for “through” to rhyme with “two”?

  • otp@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    4 days ago

    I’m not sure why you’re crying, but you’re incorrect.

    It is surprising to many people outside of the Deaf Community, but Deaf people can often hear. The Deaf are considered deaf once they have passed a certain decibel (dB) hearing loss. Many people who are profoundly deaf can still hear planes, dogs barking, etc. Hearing a sound does not mean that Deaf people can understand speech. A person with a significant hearing loss generally has difficulty or inability to hear speech even when aided.

    https://www.gatecommunications.org/deafness

    As well, people with cochlear implants are (generally?) also Deaf, but with the implant, they can hear.

    • DavidDoesLemmy
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Do you have a link to a more reputable site? Gate communications is an American thing.

      • azulavoir@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Are Americans intrinsically wrong about Everything? Like, I get most things, but surely one of us has had a correct thought before

      • FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Just look it up.

        It’s like being blind: a lot of blind people can still see but not well.

        Or using a wheelchair, a lot of people in wheelchairs can still stand short periods or walk short distances, but have a very short limit.

        ETC

        Society oversimplifies these things to be binary, but in reality they are a spectrum.

      • otp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        You’ve got multiple sources now. It’s good to question things, but you might want to start by questioning the things that you’ve previously learned when encountering new information.

        • DavidDoesLemmy
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          How come you can say someone’s partially deaf when deafness already covers people who can partially hear? Isn’t that redundant?

          • otp@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Yes, it is redundant. The things people can say are not always completely medically accurate.