• maniacalmanicmaniaOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    The Australian Royal Navy to my understanding maintains roughly somewhere between 7 and 14 nuclear-powered submarines.

    Say what now? Are you human or a LLM?

    • Forester@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      I do not follow Australian politics closely but I was under the impression you guys were in the middle of an arms build up because of China doing China things in the South China Sea. From what I can see on a cursory Google, you guys definitely do have strong plans to acquire nuclear-powered subs.

      For some reason I thought you guys had just purchased a bunch from France, but I’m guessing that must be someone else in the region.

      https://www.navy.gov.au/capabilities/ships-boats-and-submarines/nuclear-powered-submarines#%3A~%3Atext=Australia's+future+conventionally-armed%2C+nuclear%2Cthat+operate+nuclear-powered+submarines.

      Look at my post history. I’m definitely an autistic as fuck human avoiding his desk job, alternating between typing on my phone and using googles shitty auto dictation.

      • The_Decryptor
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        We ordered a bunch of subs from France, using a nuclear design as the base, but our government had them rip out the nuclear reactors from the design and stuff diesel engines in their place instead.

        Then they walked away from that agreement entirely and joined up with the US and UK instead.

        Edit: Oh, and the subs we’re now buying from the US, we’re getting the US to maintain them because we’ve got no capability to do so here.