• yeahiknow3@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Well, as I said above…

      The bill seeks to make it harder for billionaires to buy elections.

      • It caps individual donations to $20,000/year
      • It forces real time disclosures of donations of $1000 or more.
      • It limits campaign spending to $800k/seat and $90 million/party.

      It is a fantastic bill that makes it harder for the rich to steal elections. That’s why this literal coal baron (Australia’s Trump) hates the bill:

      Yeah, right. Regular Australians harmed by an $800k spending limit. Ridiculous.

      • ZagorathOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        You don’t see how it’s beneficial to the big parties and very harmful to independents to have parties be able to amortise their advertising spend across all the seats they’re running in, where an independent candidate is stuck at the limit for a single seat?

        But more to the point: you don’t think it’s problematic to be trying to rush through the legislation without giving it time to undergo proper rigorous scrutiny? Even if its goals are just, if the method by which it’s being achieved is not transparent, how can we trust their intentions? Especially if both Labor and the LNP are on board. That is what’s ridiculous.

        • yeahiknow3@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          There’s no universe in which it makes sense to allow billionaire coal barons to buy elections, for “independent” parties or otherwise. I’m not sure what more there is to discuss.

          The legislation is being rushed because it’s desperately needed and moneyed interests are already spreading disinformation to infect Australian politics just like they did in the US. For instance, this very video. I assume the woman in the video is well-intentioned though — no need to ascribe malice where stupidity will suffice.

          • ZagorathOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 hours ago

            There’s no universe in which it makes sense to pass a bill in a single sitting week which won’t take effect until after the next election regardless without allowing full scrutiny by independent experts. I’m not sure what more there is to discuss.

            Seriously, your point of view here is fucking insane. Yes, the stated goals of this bill are laudable. We should be trying to minimise how much influence Palmer can have over politics. But not at the expense of minor parties and independents and in a way which reinforces the power of the major two parties. Any time a bill is rushed through this quickly, you should always be highly suspicious. You should also be highly suspicious of any bill that the ALP and LNP agree with but which smaller parties like the Greens and independents like Pocock disagree with. Doubly so if over 80% of ALP and LNP’s own voters don’t trust the process.

            Have you even watched the video?