• auzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      If you voted for a guy who can’t even say his opponents name properly , you are also an idiot voting for another idiot.

      Being able to learn to say your opponents name is a life skill which is useful for presidency… And Kamala’s name isn’t hard

      It’s absolutely fucked that a lot of them stood their laughing as he displayed that he never left high school

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      While they didn’t help, I suspect their numbers were small enough to not matter in the scheme of what happened.

      The answer is likely mundane. My guess is overall turnout was lower because things didn’t feel as ‘crisis’ like as 2020. The needle for people barely aware of politics even as they vote stayed at the same place as it was in 2020: Things aren’t great, kick whoever is in office out in hopes the alternative does better. Last time they came out for Biden because Trump was at the wheel. Now they show up for Trump because the president was a democrat.

      This segment of the electorate is not particularly politically aware, let alone active, and likely has little to no opinion about the broader world. The relative likelihood of them turning up at all depends on how badly things are going (less likely to show up this time compared to the unprecedented mess of 2020), and to the extent they show up they just vote against whoever is in charge that day.

      However, those people are generally quiet, and so we turn our focus instead to the loudest folks proclaiming a refusal to vote for Harris.

      If it was close, I would agree. It wasn’t even close by such a huge margin the more mundane factors I think are the only ones big enough to explain things.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        My guess is overall turnout was lower because things didn’t feel as ‘crisis’ like as 2020.

        What an insane take…

        • jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          For the politically disengaged? It is an accurate take.

          In 2020, you had massive unemployment. People personally were stuck at home with nowhere they could go. Many of them saw a loved one suffer death at the hands of a pandemic, or personally get very sick. That is a direct and visceral experience of “things are bad”. They didn’t need to follow any news, study any charts, read any policy, they knew that their direct subjective experience was bad.

          In 2024, things for people are largely normal, but a lot of bills are high. Grading on a curve, this is much further from a personal crisis for most folks. In fact, the grocery bills eased a bit so some people might be seeing a natural ‘light at the end of the tunnel’.

          The biggest discused crisis factors in forums like this are only being considered by the politically engaged, and that’s just not most people. Whether it should be or not…

            • jj4211@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              Unfortunately, I think the media has blared the things people should be caring like crazy. Problems remain:

              • People only internalize their personal experience, and they only care so much about what they see on the screen.
              • To the extent they may care, they also see a counter campaign of folks claiming otherwise, and they don’t really have a good way to casually know which viewpoint to take seriously.
              • Fedizen@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                I think that points to the democrats need for sneaker based messaging networks. Instead of buying huge expensive ads that nonvoters won’t watch and giving that money out to tv networks why not use the high volunteer base to buy t shirts and restaurant meal coupons then hand them out to people. stuff like that. I think there needs to be more lateral thinking here. Less emails, more tshirts.

            • AngryRobot@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              Yez, but not in the way you’re thinking. People have been radicalized by misogynists on youtube and tiktok that Russia has paid for. It’s been proven for some of them, and if you think they’re the only ones, you’re living in a fantasy land.

              • Fedizen@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                Except gen z men voted at like a 2% more for trump in a low turnout election its like well within every margin of error that it could be decreasing support since 2020.

                The significant portion of the almost 20 million Biden voters that just checked out of politics and decided since everything seemed ok, no need to vote. Thats the media outreach problem. It guarantees that republicans will regain power everytime the economy gets patched up with duct tape.

        • Fedizen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 month ago

          This is largely how non voters have responded when asked as far as I’ve seen: “feels like things aren’t broken, I can sit this out”

          Its not a take its just the reality we live in.

      • AngryRobot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        It doesn’t matter. A vote that was not cast or cast for anyone other than Harris we warned them and warned them, and they didn’t listen.

        If I ever hear someone say “Gen Z will save us” again, I’m going to have some strong words for them. Gen Z is a bunch of knuckle-dragging Neanderthals and they’ll be the death of us.

    • acargitz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      59
      ·
      1 month ago

      Keep punching left and down. That will really help build the coalition to resist fascism.

      • morphballganon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        The people who stayed home are not the people on the left. The people on the left voted against fascism. The people who stayed home for the election are also going to be useless in an anti-fascism coalition, seeing as they couldn’t be bothered to do the bare minimum.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I’m not punching left, and I refuse to accept your categorisation of anything short of completely trashing the DNC is not left enough.

        The reason I voted for Harris is because I care about the lives of Palestinians. You can try to claim that this isn’t true, but you’re just wrong. And none of your bullshit purity tests will change that.

        If you call yourself a progressive, and you stayed home on Tuesday, I want nothing to do with you. There’s my purity test. Fuck right off.

        • acargitz@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          The only thing I said was don’t punch left. I literally said none of the other things you are ranting about, so go bark at someone else.

          I didn’t vote for Harris, because… I’m not a US citizen. I would have if I were, if you need to know. I’m sitting here on my side of the border, seeing fascism take over on your side and I’m shocked to see you guys bicker about pointing fingers instead of facing reality and thinking wtf you have to do to survive the next 4 years. It’s as if you don’t really understand what’s about to hit you.

          You’re in deep crisis mode. Being mad at Muslims and Stein voters and non-voters is going to be a barrier to building a coalition of resistance. That’s just the plain reality of what strategic organizing will require. Don’t burn bridges with the people you will need in the next 4 years. You hit the iceberg, now is not the time to point fingers about whose fault that it is, it’s time to get to the boats and every one who can help with that is valuable.

          • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            1 month ago

            The only thing I said was don’t punch left. I literally said none of the other things you are ranting about,

            Ok then, what the fuck does “punching left” mean?

            • acargitz@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              Third paragraph of my previous comment:

              Being mad at Muslims and Stein voters and non-voters is going to be a barrier to building a coalition of resistance. That’s just the plain reality of what strategic organizing will require. Don’t burn bridges with the people you will need in the next 4 years.

      • wpb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        I feel like you have a misconception about how democracy works. When there’s position that enjoys broad popular support (such as universal health care, or a cessation of the genocide in Gaza), it isn’t on the democrats to take that position so the electorate will vote for them, it’s on the electorate to either change their mind on the issue, or vote for the democrats regardless.

        It’s important to internalize this lesson. Next cycle you’ll likely get to practice it with trans rights, if the talking heads on MSNBC who are blaming wokeness for the democrats losing the election are any indication. The idea that politicians and their policies are responsible for losing/winning elections is silly. You’re here for them, not the other way around.