• zero_spelled_with_an_ecks@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      They already said it’s derogatory. It’s like if somebody called you on idiot. The denotation would be that your intelligence is lacking. The connotation would be that you’re a lesser person for it and cause issues for those around you. In the same way, whore and prostitute have to some denotation but different connotations with the former having the negative connotation. Is that simple enough for you to understand now?

        • zero_spelled_with_an_ecks@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          No, it doesn’t make it ok because somebody else does it or that the blame should be on the party that did it first. That’s an argument a five year old might think is clever; nobody here thinks it is. You have an opportunity to learn here. Will you take it or will you continue to blame others for your poor behavior?

          • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            It does however highlight how the user and you don’t really care about the use of language and merely use it as an excuse to attack me because I don’t conform to your agenda on prostitution legality.

            • zero_spelled_with_an_ecks@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              2 months ago

              If we’re using your source, you should be for legalizing prostitution in some places such as the USA because it reduces trafficking. Tell me again, which of us has the agenda?

              • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                The study looks at both the supplying countries and the legalizing countries, before and after, and found that there is a direct increase in human trafficking as a result of legalization. How would that ever be an advocacy for legalization? Psychopath.

                • zero_spelled_with_an_ecks@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  No, we’ve been over this, it does not show a direct increase. Average is the word they used. If you keep repeating the same wrong thing, it doesn’t suddenly become correct.

                  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    You can’t just say “nuh uh” and look away. Both with words and on the multiple graphs show increase as a result of legalization.

        • FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          both are slurs. One’s got far more heavy historical context of slavery and oppression, but both are words used to stigmatise and insult a certain group, and they have been reclaimed by various extents by said groups.

          And for the record you casually using the word “whore” is probably more insulting than me comparing two words that are used to oppress groups.