• ravhall@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    I wish the Inkscape team would make a raster option. GIMP is just lagging, and we need a solid pixel pusher.

        • Earth Walker@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          12 days ago

          The thing is Photoshop does a lot of different stuff, like photo manipulation, painting, and pixel art. But it’s not really the best at anything besides photo manipulation probably. So it depends on what you want to do with it.

          • ravhall@discuss.online
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            12 days ago

            I need to be able to edit photos, raw files, lossless options, with layers, and a wide selection of touch up tools that can be content aware.

            Photoshop is perfect, but I’m not paying for a subscription to a product that I realistically don’t need updates for.

            I’d be totally fine using my old copy of photoshop CS if it would run anymore.

            Gimp just had a lot of odd UI choices.

    • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      This would complicate the code behind Inkscape and the user interface a lot. It’s not just having an option to enable raster editing, the entire program must be rewritten, because its not designed to do raster editing. If they started with raster editing, it would be lacking too and the horrors from users would never end. I rather want Inkscape stay focused to what its doing best.

      Either use GIMP or Krita. There are already excellent or good enough image editing tools.

      • ravhall@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 days ago

        Yeah, but it’s a little too much about illustration for me. It’s great for that! I just need more of a pixel pusher.